Cardiac CT After Coronary Revascularization: Enough to Make a Difference?
- PMID: 31422144
- PMCID: PMC8713549
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.07.006
Cardiac CT After Coronary Revascularization: Enough to Make a Difference?
Keywords: computed tomography perfusion; coronary computed tomography angiography; effective dose; fractional flow reserve; in-stent restenosis.
Comment on
-
CT Perfusion Versus Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected In-Stent Restenosis or CAD Progression.JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Mar;13(3):732-742. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.05.031. Epub 2019 Aug 14. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020. PMID: 31422127
References
-
- Shaw LJ, Blankstein R, Brown DL, et al. Controversies in diagnostic imaging of patients with suspected stable and acute chest pain syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2019;12 7 Pt 1: 1254–78. - PubMed
-
- Greenwood JP, Ripley DP, Berry C, et al. Effect of care guided by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, or NICE guidelines on subsequent unnecessary angiography rates: the CE-MARC 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016;316(10):1051–60. - PubMed
-
- Nagel E, Greenwood JP, McCann GP, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion or fractional flow reserve in coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:2418–28. - PubMed
-
- Andreini D, Mushtaq S, Pontone G, et al. CT perfusion versus coronary CT angiography in patients with suspected in-stent restenosis or CAD progression. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2019;13:732–42. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources