Ultrafast gas chromatography coupled to electronic nose to identify volatile biomarkers in exhaled breath from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A pilot study
- PMID: 31423612
- DOI: 10.1002/bmc.4684
Ultrafast gas chromatography coupled to electronic nose to identify volatile biomarkers in exhaled breath from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A pilot study
Abstract
An analytical method to identify volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the exhaled breath from patients with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using a ultrafast gas chromatography system equipped with an electronic nose detector (FGC eNose) has been developed. A prospective study was performed in 23 COPD patients and 33 healthy volunteers; exhalation breathing tests were performed with Tedlar bags. Each sample was analyzed by FCG eNose and the identification of VOCs was based on the Kovats index. Raw data were reduced by principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical discriminant analysis [canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP)]. The FCG eNose technology was able to identify 17 VOCs that distinguish COPD patients from healthy volunteers. At all stages of PCA and CAP the discrimination between groups was obvious. Chemical prints were correctly classified up to 82.2%, and were matched with 78.9% of the VOCs detected in the exhaled breath samples. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated the sensitivity and specificity to be 96% and 91%, respectively. This pilot study demonstrates that FGC eNose is a useful tool to identify VOCs as biomarkers in exhaled breath from COPD patients. Further studies should be performed to enhance the clinical relevance of this quick and ease methodology for COPD diagnosis.
Keywords: COPD; electronic nose; exhaled breath; gas chromatography; multivariate analysis; volatile organic compounds.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of volatile organic compounds in the breath of patients with stable or acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.J Breath Res. 2018 Mar 6;12(3):036002. doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/aaa4c5. J Breath Res. 2018. PMID: 29295966
-
The Influence of Smoking Status on Exhaled Breath Profiles in Asthma and COPD Patients.Molecules. 2021 Mar 4;26(5):1357. doi: 10.3390/molecules26051357. Molecules. 2021. PMID: 33806279 Free PMC article.
-
Exhaled breath profiling in patients with COPD and OSA overlap syndrome: a pilot study.J Breath Res. 2016 Nov 3;10(4):041001. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/10/4/041001. J Breath Res. 2016. PMID: 27811380
-
Exhaled volatile organic compounds associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations-a systematic review and validation.J Breath Res. 2025 Mar 11;19(2). doi: 10.1088/1752-7163/adba06. J Breath Res. 2025. PMID: 39999477
-
Electronic Nose Technology in Respiratory Diseases.Lung. 2017 Apr;195(2):157-165. doi: 10.1007/s00408-017-9987-3. Epub 2017 Feb 25. Lung. 2017. PMID: 28238110 Review.
Cited by
-
Breath Analysis: A Promising Tool for Disease Diagnosis-The Role of Sensors.Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 6;22(3):1238. doi: 10.3390/s22031238. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35161984 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Research progress of electronic nose technology in exhaled breath disease analysis.Microsyst Nanoeng. 2023 Oct 11;9:129. doi: 10.1038/s41378-023-00594-0. eCollection 2023. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2023. PMID: 37829158 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative analysis of chemical breath-prints through olfactory technology for the discrimination between SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and controls.Clin Chim Acta. 2021 Aug;519:126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.04.015. Epub 2021 Apr 24. Clin Chim Acta. 2021. PMID: 33901429 Free PMC article.
-
The State of the Art on Graphene-Based Sensors for Human Health Monitoring through Breath Biomarkers.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 19;23(22):9271. doi: 10.3390/s23229271. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38005657 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An improved AdaBoost algorithm for identification of lung cancer based on electronic nose.Heliyon. 2023 Feb 21;9(3):e13633. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13633. eCollection 2023 Mar. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 36915521 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Allers, M., Langejuergen, J., Gaida, A., Holz, O., Schuchardt, S., Hohlfeld, J. M., & Zimmermann, S. (2016). Measurement of exhaled volatile organic compounds from patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) using closed gas loop GC-IMS and GC-APCI-MS. Journal of Breath Research, 10, 026004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7155/10/2/026004
-
- Anderson, M. J. W. T. (2003). Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: A useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology, 84, 511-525. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0511:CAOPCA]2.0.CO;2
-
- Basanta, M., Ibrahim, B., Dockry, R., Douce, D., Morris, M., Singh, D., … Fowler, S. J. (2012). Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds for Phenotyping Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study. Respiratory Research, 13, 72.
-
- Bateman, E. D., Hurd, S. S., Barnes, P. J., Bousquet, J., Drazen, J. M., FitzGerald, M., … Zar, H. J. (2008). Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary. The European Respiratory Journal, 31, 143-178. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00138707
-
- Batres, S. A., Leon, J. V., & Alvarez-Sala, R. (2007). Nutritional status in COPD. Archivos de Bronconeumología, 43, 283-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1579-2129(07)60068-8
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous