Modifiable Risk Factors Explain Socioeconomic Inequalities in Dementia Risk: Evidence from a Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study
- PMID: 31424404
- PMCID: PMC6839472
- DOI: 10.3233/JAD-190541
Modifiable Risk Factors Explain Socioeconomic Inequalities in Dementia Risk: Evidence from a Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Background: Differences in dementia risk across the gradient of socioeconomic status (SES) exist, but their determinants are not well understood.
Objective: This study investigates whether health conditions and lifestyle-related risk factors explain the SES inequalities in dementia risk.
Methods: 6,346 participants from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing were followed up from 2008/2009 until 2014/2015. We used Cox regression adjusted for age, gender, wealth/education, and clustering at the household level to examine the association between SES markers (wealth, education) and time to dementia in a structural equation model including potential mediation or effect modification by a weighted compound score of twelve modifiable risk and protective factors for dementia ('LIfestyle for BRAin health' (LIBRA) score).
Results: During a median follow-up of 6 years, 192 individuals (3.0%) developed dementia. LIBRA scores decreased with increasing wealth and higher educational level. A one-point increase in the LIBRA score was associated with a 13% increase in dementia risk (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.07-1.19). Higher wealth was associated with a decreased dementia risk (HR = 0.58, 0.39-0.85). Mediation analysis showed that 52% of the risk difference between the highest and lowest wealth tertile was mediated by differences in LIBRA (indirect effect: HR = 0.75, 0.66-0.85). Education was not directly associated with dementia (HR = 1.05, 0.69-1.59), but was a distal risk factor for dementia by explaining differences in wealth and LIBRA scores (indirect effect high education: HR = 0.92, 0.88-0.95).
Conclusion: Socioeconomic differences in dementia risk can be partly explained by differences in modifiable health conditions and lifestyle factors.
Keywords: Aging; cohort study; dementia; epidemiology; health inequalities; lifestyle; mediation; prevention; public health; risk factors; socioeconomic status.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors’ disclosures available online (
Figures



References
-
- Marmot M (2005) Social determinants of health inequalities, Lancet 365, 1099–1104. - PubMed
-
- Stringhini S, Carmeli C, Jokela M, Avendano M, Muennig P, Guida F, Ricceri F, d’Errico A, Barros H, Bochud M, Chadeau-Hyam M, Clavel-Chapelon F, Costa G, Delpierre C, Fraga S, Goldberg M, Giles GG, Krogh V, Kelly-Irving M, Layte R, Lasserre AM, Marmot MG, Preisig M, Shipley MJ, Vollenweider P, Zins M, Kawachi I, Steptoe A, Mackenbach JP, Vineis P, Kivimaki M (2017) Socioeconomic status and the 25 x 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: A multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1.7 million men and women, Lancet 389, 1229–1237. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Krieger N, Williams DR, Moss NE (1997) Measuring social class in US public health research: Concepts, methodologies, and guidelines, Annu Rev Public Health 18, 341–378. - PubMed
-
- Clark AM, DesMeules M, Luo W, Duncan AS, Wielgosz A (2009) Socioeconomic status and cardiovascular disease: Risks and implications for care, Nat Rev Cardiol 6, 712–722. - PubMed
-
- Marmot MG, Bosma H, Hemingway H, Brunner E, Stansfeld S (1997) Contribution of job control and other risk factors to social variations in coronary heart disease incidence, Lancet 350, 235–239. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical