Phenobarbitone versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review
- PMID: 31425629
- PMCID: PMC6699655
- DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002217.pub3
Phenobarbitone versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review
Abstract
Background: This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2001, and last updated in 2013. This review is one in a series of Cochrane Reviews investigating pair-wise monotherapy comparisons.Epilepsy is a common neurological condition in which abnormal electrical discharges from the brain cause recurrent unprovoked seizures. It is believed that with effective drug treatment, up to 70% of individuals with active epilepsy have the potential to become seizure-free and go into long-term remission shortly after starting drug therapy with a single antiepileptic drug in monotherapy.Worldwide, particularly in the developing world, phenytoin and phenobarbitone are commonly used antiepileptic drugs, primarily because they are inexpensive. The aim of this review is to summarise data from existing trials comparing phenytoin and phenobarbitone.
Objectives: To review the time to treatment failure, remission and first seizure with phenobarbitone compared with phenytoin when used as monotherapy in people with focal onset seizures (simple or complex focal and secondarily generalised), or generalised onset tonic-clonic seizures (with or without other generalised seizure types).
Search methods: For the latest update, we searched the following databases on 21 August 2018: the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), which includes Cochrane Epilepsy's Specialized Register and CENTRAL; MEDLINE; the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register (ClinicalTrials.gov); and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We handsearched relevant journals and contacted pharmaceutical companies, original trial investigators, and experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing monotherapy with either phenobarbitone or phenytoin in children or adults with focal onset seizures or generalised onset tonic-clonic seizures.
Data collection and analysis: This was an individual participant data (IPD), review. Our primary outcome was time to treatment failure. Our secondary outcomes were time to first seizure post-randomisation, time to six-month remission and time to 12-month remission. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models to obtain trial-specific estimates of hazard ratios (HRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using the generic inverse variance method to obtain the overall pooled HR and 95% CI.
Main results: Individual participant data were obtained for five studies, which recruited a total of 635 participants, representing 80% of 798 individuals from all seven identified eligible trials. For remission outcomes, an HR of less than 1 indicates an advantage for phenytoin and for first seizure and treatment failure outcomes an HR of less than 1 indicates an advantage for phenobarbitone.Results for the primary outcome of the review were: time to treatment failure for any reason related to treatment (pooled HR adjusted for seizure type for 499 participants: 1.61, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.12, low-certainty evidence), time to treatment failure due to adverse events (pooled HR adjusted for seizure type for 499 participants: 1.99, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.87, low-certainty evidence), time to treatment failure due to lack of efficacy (pooled HR adjusted for seizure type for 499 participants: 1.87, 95% CI 1.32 to 2.66, moderate-certainty evidence), showing a statistically significant advantage for phenytoin compared to phenobarbitone.For our secondary outcomes, we did not find any statistically significant differences between phenytoin and phenobarbitone: time to first seizure post-randomisation (pooled HR adjusted for seizure type for 624 participants: 0.85, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.06, moderate-certainty evidence), time to 12-month remission (pooled HR adjusted for seizure type for 588 participants: 0.90, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.19, moderate-certainty evidence), and time to six-month remission pooled HR adjusted for seizure type for 588 participants: 0.91, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.15, moderate-certainty evidence).For individuals with focal onset seizures (73% of individuals contributing to analysis), numerical results were similar and conclusions the same as for analyses of all individuals and for individuals with generalised onset seizures (27% of individuals contributing to analysis), results were imprecise and no clear differences between the drugs were observed.Several confounding factors, most notably the differences in design of the trials with respect to blinding, were likely to have impacted on the results of the primary outcome 'time to treatment failure', and in turn, the treatment failure rates may have impacted on the secondary efficacy outcomes of time to first seizure and time to 12-month and six-month remission.
Authors' conclusions: Low-certainty evidence from this review suggests that phenytoin may be a more effective drug than phenobarbitone in terms of treatment retention (treatment failures due to lack of efficacy or adverse events or both). Moderate-certainty evidence from this review also indicates no differences between the drugs in terms of time to seizure recurrence and seizure remission.However, the trials contributing to the analyses had methodological inadequacies and methodological design differences that may have impacted upon the results of this review. Therefore, we do not suggest that results of this review alone should form the basis of a treatment choice for a patient with newly onset seizures. We recommend that future trials should be designed to the highest quality possible with consideration of masking, choice of population, classification of seizure type, duration of follow-up, choice of outcomes and analysis, and presentation of results.
Conflict of interest statement
Sarah J Nevitt: none known.
Anthony G Marson: a consortium of pharmaceutical companies (GSK, EISAI, UCB Pharma) funded the National Audit of Seizure Management in Hospitals (NASH) through grants paid to University of Liverpool. Professor Tony Marson is Theme Leader for Managing Complex Needs at NIHR CLAHRC NWC.
Catrin Tudur Smith: none known.
Figures

































Update of
- doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002217.pub2
References
References to studies included in this review
Czapinski 1997 {published data only}
-
- Czapinski P, Terczynski A, Czapinska E. Randomised 36‐month comparative study of valproic acid (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PHB) and carbamazepine (CBZ) efficacy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy with partial complex seizures. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 1997;150:162‐3.
de Silva 1996 {published data only}
-
- Silva M, MacArdle B, McGowan M, Hughes E, Stewart K, Neville BG. Randomised comparative monotherapy trial of phenobarbitone, phenytoin, carbamazepine, or sodium valproate for newly diagnosed childhood epilepsy. Lancet 1996;347:709‐13. - PubMed
Heller 1995 {published data only}
-
- Heller AJ, Chesterman P, Elwes RD, Crawford P, Chadwick D, Johnson AL, et al. Phenobarbitone, phenytoin, carbamazepine, or sodium valproate for newly diagnosed adult epilepsy: a randomised comparative monotherapy trial. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1995;58(1):44‐50. - PMC - PubMed
Mattson 1985 {published data only}
-
- Mattson RH, Cramer JA, Collins JF, Smith DB, Delgado‐Escueta AV, Browne TR, et al. Comparison of carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and primidone in partial and secondarily generalized tonic‐clonic seizures. New England Journal of Medicine 1985;313(3):145‐51. - PubMed
Ogunrin 2005 {published data only}
-
- Ogunrin O, Adamolekun B, Ogunniyi A. Cognitive effects of anti‐epileptic drugs in Nigerians with epilepsy. African Journal of Neurological Sciences 2005;24(1):18‐24.
Pal 1998 {published data only}
-
- Pal DK, Das T, Chaudhury G, Johnson AL, Neville BG. Randomised controlled trial to assess acceptability of phenobarbital for childhood epilepsy in rural India. Lancet 1998;351:19‐23. - PubMed
Thilothammal 1996 {published data only}
-
- Thilothammal N, Banu K, Ratnam RS. Comparison of phenobarbitone, phenytoin with sodium valproate: randomised, double‐blind study. Indian Pediatrics 1996;33(7):549‐55. - PubMed
References to studies excluded from this review
Bird 1966 {published data only}
-
- Bird CA, Griffin BP, Miklaszewka JM, Galbraith AW. Tegretol (carbamazepine): a controlled trial of a new anti‐convulsant. British Journal of Psychiatry 1966;112:737‐42.
Cereghino 1974 {published data only}
-
- Cereghino JJ, Brock JT, Meter JC, Penry JK, Smith LD, White BG. Carbamazepine for epilepsy: a controlled prospective evaluation. Neurology 1974;24(5):401‐10. - PubMed
Cereghino 1975 {published data only}
-
- Cereghino JJ, Brock JT, Meter JC, Penry JK, Smith LD, White BG. The efficacy of carbamazepine combinations in epilepsy. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1975;18(6):733‐41. - PubMed
Gruber 1962 {published data only}
-
- Gruber CM, Brock JT. Comparison of the effectiveness of phenobarbital, mephobarbital, primidone, diphenylhydantoin, ethotoin, metharbital and methylphenylhydantoin in motor seizures. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1962;3(1):23‐8. - PubMed
Meador 1990 {published data only}
-
- Meador K, Loring D, Huh K, Gallagher B, King D. Comparative cognitive effects of anticonvulsants. Neurology 1990;40(3 Pt 1):391‐4. - PubMed
Verma 2010 {published data only}
-
- Verma G, Pathak U, Jaiswal V, Upadhyay A. Comparision of phenobarbitone with phenytoin for the treatment of seizures in term and near term neonates. Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting, 1‐4 May 2010, Vancouver. Abstract No: 2849.304. http://www.abstracts2view.com/pasall/view.php?nu=PAS10L1_1706 2010.
White 1966 {published data only}
-
- White TW, Plott D, Norton J. Relative anticonvulsant potency of primidone. Archives of Neurology 1966;14(1):31‐5. - PubMed
Additional references
Annegers 1999
-
- Annegers JF, Dubinsky S, Coan SP, Newmark ME, Roht L. The incidence of epilepsy and unprovoked seizures in multiethnic, urban health maintenance organizations. Epilepsia 1999;40(4):502‐6. - PubMed
Banu 2007
Baulac 2002
-
- Baulac M, Cramer JA, Mattson RH. Phenobarbital and other barbiturates: adverse effects. In: Levy RH, Mattson RH, Meldrum BS, et al. editor(s). Antiepileptic Drugs. 5. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002:528‐40.
Bromley 2014
Carl 1992
-
- Carl GF, Smith ML. Phenytoin‐folate interactions: differing effects of the sodium salt and the free acid of phenytoin. Epilepsia 1992;33(2):372‐5. - PubMed
Cockerell 1995
-
- Cockerell OC, Johnson AL, Sander JW, Hart YM, Shorvon SD. Remission of epilepsy: results from the National General Practice Study of Epilepsy. Lancet 1995;346(8968):140‐4. - PubMed
Commission 1981
-
- Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy. Proposal for revised clinical and electroencephalographic classification of epileptic seizures.. Epilepsia 1981;22(4):489‐501. - PubMed
Commission 1989
-
- Commission on Classification and Terminology of the International League Against Epilepsy. Proposal for revised classification of epilepsies and epileptic syndromes. Epilepsia 1989;30(4):389‐99. - PubMed
Gladstone 1992
-
- Gladstone DJ, Bologa M, Maguire C, Pastuszak A, Koren G. Course of pregnancy and fetal outcome following maternal exposure to carbamazepine and phenytoin: a prospective study. Reproductive Toxicology 1992;6(3):257‐61. - PubMed
Granger 1995
-
- Granger P, Biton B, Faure C, Vige X, Depoortere H, Graham D, et al. Modulation of the gamma aminobutyricacid type A receptor by the antiepileptic drugs carbamazepine and phenytoin. Molecular Pharmacology 1995;47(6):1189‐96. - PubMed
Hauser 1993
-
- Hauser WA, Annegers JF, Kurland LT. Incidence of epilepsy and unprovoked seizures in Rochester, Minnesota 1935 ‐ 1984. Epilepsia 1993;34:453‐68. - PubMed
Higgins 2003
Higgins 2017
-
- Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Higgins JPT, Churchill R, Chandler J, Cumpston MS (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.2.0 (updated June 2017). Cochrane, 2017, Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
Hirtz 2007
-
- Hirtz D, Thurman DJ, Gwinn‐Hardy K, Mohamed M, Chaudhuri AR, Zalutsky R. How common are the "common" neurologic disorders?. Neurology 2007;68:326‐37. - PubMed
ILAE 1998
-
- ILAE Commission on Antiepileptic Drugs. Considerations on designing clinical trials to evaluate the place of new antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of newly diagnosed and chronic patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 1998;39(7):799. - PubMed
ILAE 2006
-
- Glauser T, Ben‐Menachem E, Bourgeois B, Cnaan A, Chadwick D, Guerreiro C, et al. ILAE treatment guidelines: evidence‐based analysis of antiepileptic drug efficacy and effectiveness as initial monotherapy for epileptic seizures and syndromes. Epilepsia 2006;47(7):1094‐120. - PubMed
Jones 1996
Juul‐Jenson 1983
-
- Juul‐Jenson P, Foldspang A. Natural history of epileptic seizures. Epilepsia 1983;24:297‐312. - PubMed
Kirkham 2010
-
- Kirkham JJ, Dwan KM, Altman DG, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R, et al. The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ 2010;340:c365. - PubMed
Kwan 2000
-
- Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. New England Journal of Medicine 2000;342:314‐9. - PubMed
Lefebvre 2011
-
- Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from http://handbook.cochrane.org/.
MacDonald 1995
-
- MacDonald RL, Kelly KM. Antiepileptic drug mechanisms of action. Epilepsia 1995;36(Suppl 2):S2‐12. - PubMed
MacDonald 2000
-
- MacDonald BK, Johnson AL, Goodridge DM, Cockerell OC, Sander JW, Shorvon SD. Factors predicting prognosis of epilepsy after presentation with seizures. Annals of Neurology 2000;48:833‐41. - PubMed
Malafosse 1994
-
- Malfosse A, Genton P, Hirsch E, Marescaux C, Broglin D, Bernasconi R. Idiopathic Generalised Epilepsies: Clinical, Experimental and Genetic. Eastleigh: John Libbey and Company, 1994.
Marson 2000
Meador 2008
Moher 2009
Morrow 2006
Murray 1994
-
- Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global Comparative Assessments in the Health Sector. World Health Organization, 1994.
Nevitt 2017a
Nevitt 2017b
Nevitt 2018a
Nevitt 2018b
Nevitt 2018c
Nevitt 2018d
Nevitt 2019a
Ngugi 2010
NICE 2012
-
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. The epilepsies: the diagnosis and management of the epilepsies in adults and children in primary and secondary care. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Clinical Guidance 137; available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg137/resources/epilepsies‐diagnosis‐an... (accessed 18 December 2018). 2012.
Nolan 2013a
-
- Nolan SJ, Sutton L, Marson A, Tudur Smith C. Consistency of outcome and statistical reporting of time‐to‐event data: the impact on Cochrane Reviews and meta‐analyses in epilepsy. Better knowledge for better health. 21st Cochrane Colloquium. Quebec City, Canada: The Cochrane Collaboration, 2013 September 19‐23:114‐5.
Nulman 1997
-
- Nulman I, Scolnik D, Chitayat D, Farkas LD, Koren G. Findings in children exposed in utero to phenytoin and carbamazepine monotherapy: independent effects of epilepsy and medications. American Journal of Medical Genetics 1997;68(1):18‐24. - PubMed
Olafsson 2005
-
- Olafsson E, Ludvigsson P, Gudmundsson G, Hesdorfer D, Kjartansson O, Hauser WA. Incidence of unprovoked seizures and epilepsy in Iceland and assessment of the epilepsy syndrome classification: a prospective study. Lancet Neurology 2005;4:627‐34. - PubMed
Parmar 1998
-
- Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta‐analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Statistics in Medicine 1998;17(24):2815‐34. - PubMed
Ragsdale 1991
-
- Ragsdale DS, Scheuer T, Catterall WA. Frequency and voltage dependent inhibition of type hA Naı channels, expressed in a mammalian cell line, by local anesthetic, antiarrhythmic, and anticonvulsant drugs. Molecular Pharmacology 1991;40:756‐65. - PubMed
Rho 1996
Sander 1996
Sander 2004
-
- Sander JW. The use of anti‐epileptic drugs ‐ principles and practice. Epilepsia 2004;45(6):28‐34. - PubMed
Scheffer 2017
Scheinfeld 2003
-
- Scheinfeld N. Phenytoin in cutaneous medicine: its uses, mechanisms and side effects. Dermatology Online Journal 2003;9(3):6. - PubMed
Stata 2015 [Computer program]
-
- StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP, 2015.
Trimble 1988
-
- Trimble MR, Cull C. Children of school age: the influence of antiepileptic drugs on behavior and intellect. Epilepsia 1988;29(Suppl 3):S15‐9. - PubMed
Tudur Smith 2007
Wallace 1997
-
- Wallace H, Shorvon SD, Hopkins A, O'Donoghue M. Guidelines for the Clinical Management of Adults with Poorly Controlled Epilepsy. London: Royal College of Physicians, 1997.
Weston 2016
Wilder 1995
-
- Wilder BJ. Phenytoin: clinical use. Antiepileptic Drugs. 4th edition. New York:: Raven Press, 1995:339‐44.
Williamson 2000
-
- Williamson PR, Marson AG, Tudur C, Hutton JL, Chadwick DW. Individual patient data meta‐analysis of randomized anti‐epileptic drug monotherapy trials. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2000;6(2):205‐14. - PubMed
Williamson 2002
-
- Williamson PR, Tudur Smith C, Hutton JL, Marson AG. Aggregate data meta‐analysis with time‐to‐event outcomes. Statistics in Medicine 2002;21:3337‐51. - PubMed
Willow 1985
-
- Willow M, Gonoi T, Catterall WA. Voltage clamp analysis of the inhibitory actions of diphenylhydantoin and carbamazepine on voltage sensitive sodium channels in neuroblastoma cells. Molecular Pharmacology 1985;27(5):549‐58. - PubMed
References to other published versions of this review
Nolan 2013b
Taylor 2000
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources