Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 16;24(16):2977.
doi: 10.3390/molecules24162977.

VOC Profiles of Saliva in Assessment of Halitosis and Submandibular Abscesses Using HS-SPME-GC/MS Technique

Affiliations

VOC Profiles of Saliva in Assessment of Halitosis and Submandibular Abscesses Using HS-SPME-GC/MS Technique

Fernanda Monedeiro et al. Molecules. .

Abstract

Halitosis and submandibular abscesses are examples of mouth-related diseases with the possible bacterial origin. Salivary volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are potential biomarkers of them, once they can be addressed as metabolites of bacterial activity. Healthy patients (n = 15), subjects with submandibular abscesses located in fascial deep space (n = 10), and subjects with halitosis (n = 5) were enrolled in the study. Saliva samples were subjected to headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis. A total number of 164 VOCs was detected by the developed methodology, 23 specific for halitosis and 41 for abscess. Halitosis' profiles were characterized by a larger number of sulfur compounds, while for abscess they had a higher variety of alcohols, aldehydes, and hydrocarbons-biomarkers of inflammatory processes. Principal components analysis allowed visualization of clusters formed according to the evaluated conditions. Kruskal-Wallis test indicated that 39 VOCs presented differentiated responses between the studied groups, with statistical relevance (p < 0.05). Random forest was applied, and a prediction model based on eight VOCs (2-butanone, methyl thioacetate, 2-methylbutanoic acid, S-methyl pentanethioate, dimethyl tetrasulfide, indolizine, pentadecane, and octadecanal) provided 100% of sensitivity, 82% of specificity, and 91% of balanced accuracy, indicating the specific presence of submandibular abscess.

Keywords: GC/MS; VOCs; diagnosis; halitosis; saliva; submandibular abscess.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Functional group distribution of VOCs (volatile organic compounds) for healthy patients (HE), subjects with submandibular abscesses (AB), and halitosis (HA), where: VNCs—volatile nitrogen compounds, VSCs—volatile sulfur compounds.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation networks of VOCs emitted from saliva samples from all three group of patients, where: healthy patients (HE), subjects with submandibular abscesses (AB) and halitosis (HA). VOCs are shown as nodes. Numbers in circles denote the number of volatiles from each group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Hierarchical cluster analysis and heatmap of VOC profiles based on peak areas from chromatograms. Columns represent three groups of patients (total of 30 individuals): healthy (15), segregated from an abscess (10) and halitosis (5). Rows represent 39 discriminating VOCs (orange, low abundance; red, high abundance).
Figure 4
Figure 4
PCA (Principal Component Analysis) plot depicting the differentiation of group of individuals by VOC profiles; Assigned clusters: healthy controls (HE), patients with submandibular abscess (AB) and halitosis (HA).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Assessment of variable importance, in terms of (A) mean decrease in accuracy and (B) mean decrease Gini or node impurity.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A) Exemplary decision tree produced in Random Forest approach; (B) Overlaid ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves concerning discrimination of specific condition (in green- control / “healthy”, in red- abscess, and in blue- halitosis) against all others.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cortelli J.R., Barbosa M.D.S., Westphal M.A. Halitosis: A review of associated factors and therapeutic approach. Braz. Oral Res. 2008;22:44–54. doi: 10.1590/S1806-83242008000500007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armstrong B.L., Sensat M.L., Stoltenberg J.L. Halitosis: A review of current literature. J. Dent. Hyg. 2010;84:65–74. - PubMed
    1. Akaji E.A., Folaranmi N., Ashiwaju O. Halitosis: A review of the literature on its prevalence, impact and control. Oral Health Prev. Dent. 2014;12:297–304. - PubMed
    1. Aylikci B., Çolak H. Halitosis: From diagnosis to management. J. Nat. Sci. Biol. Med. 2013;4:14. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.107255. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suzuki N., Yoneda M., Naito T., Iwamoto T., Hirofuji T. Relationship between halitosis and psychologic status. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontol. 2008;106:542–547. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.009. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms