Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 7:14:532-536.
doi: 10.1515/med-2019-0059. eCollection 2019.

Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Narrative Review

Affiliations

Minimally Invasive Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Narrative Review

Nunzio Velotti et al. Open Med (Wars). .

Abstract

The management of chronic pilonidal disease remains controversial, but recently, new minimal invasive approaches have been proposed. Whereas in the conventional surgical treatment an elliptical wedge of skin and subcutaneous tissue is created to remove the sinus and its lateral tracks, the basis for our new treatment is to create a minimal elliptical wedge of the subcutaneous tissue, including all the inflamed tissue and debris while leaving the overlying skin intact. The mechanism of an endoscopic approach relies on use of the endoscope without cutaneous tissue damage. Advantages include shorter operative time and time to discharge, which impact resource management in both primary and secondary care: patients undergoing endoscopic technique have a high satisfaction rate, probably due to the low level of postoperative pain and early return to work and daily activities. However, it is mandatory that further studies would analyze surgical approaches to pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) with a consistent and adequate follow-up of at least 5 years. Both sinusectomy and endoscopic approach to PSD were found to be safe and effective compared with conventional techniques. Publishedresults of studies of newer approaches have demonstrated a low short-term complication rate, comparable to conventional surgery results.

Keywords: Endoscopic treatment; Minimally invasive surgery; Pilonidal sinus disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest Conflict of interest statement Authors state no conflict of interest

References

    1. Chintapatla S., Safarani N., Kumar S., Haboubi N.. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review. pathological insight and surgical options, Tech Coloproctol. 2003;7:3. –. - PubMed
    1. Zinicola R., Cracco N., Serventi A., Martina S., Milone M., Sallustio P., Bondurri A., Giani I., Figus A., Zorcolo L.. Pilonidal sinus: are we missing something? Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(11):929. –. - PubMed
    1. Milone M., Sosa Fernandez LM., Milone F., De Palma GD.. Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus: How Far Have We Come? Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(6):e343. - PubMed
    1. Bascom J.. Pilonidal disease: long-term results of follicle removal. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983;26:800. –. - PubMed
    1. Soll C., Hahnloser D., Dindo D., Clavien PA., Hetzer F.. A novel approach for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: less is more. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23(2):177. –. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources