Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Mar;33(2):126-138.
doi: 10.1111/jar.12654. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

Prevalence of co-occurring psychiatric disorders in adults and adolescents with intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevalence of co-occurring psychiatric disorders in adults and adolescents with intellectual disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mario G Mazza et al. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Subjects with intellectual disability (ID) are vulnerable to experience psychiatric disorders. The present authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of co-occurring psychiatric disorders, excluding co-occurring autism spectrum disorders, in subjects with intellectual disability.

Method: The present authors performed a random-effects meta-analysis of the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in adults and adolescents with intellectual disability.

Results: Twenty-two studies were included. The pooled prevalence of any co-occurring psychiatric disorders in intellectual disability was 33.6% (95% CI: 25.2%-43.1%) with high heterogeneity but no publication bias. Prevalence was lower in population-based studies, in studies that used ICD criteria for the psychopathology and in studies with low risk of bias. The prevalence was higher in mild, moderate and severe intellectual disability than in profound intellectual disability.

Conclusions: Psychiatric disorders are common in subjects with intellectual disability, and the present authors found that clinical and methodological moderators affect the pooled prevalence.

Keywords: co-occurring psychiatric disorders; dual diagnosis; intellectual disability; meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Arya, R., Antonisamy, B., & Kumar, S. (2012). Sample size estimation in prevalence studies. Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 79(11), 1482-1488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-012-0763-3
    1. Bailey, N. M. (2007). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in adults with moderate to profound learning disabilities. Advances in Mental Health and Learning Disabilities, 1(2), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1108/17530180200700019
    1. Bakken, T. L., Helverschou, S. B., Eilertsen, D. E., Heggelund, T., Myrbakk, E., & Martinsen, H. (2010). Psychiatric disorders in adolescents and adults with autism and intellectual disability: A representative study in one county in Norway. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31(6), 1669-1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2010.04.009
    1. Bouras, N., Cowley, A., Holt, G., Newton, J. T., & Sturmey, P. (2003). Referral trends of people with intellectual disabilities and psychiatric disorders. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47(Pt 6), 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00514.x
    1. Cooper, S. A., & Bailey, N. M. (2001). Psychiatric disorders amongst adults with learning disabilities - prevalence and relationship to ability level. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, 18, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0790966700006315

LinkOut - more resources