Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Oct;119(10):1686-1694.
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693464. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

Use of Prophylaxis for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Isolated Foot or Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Use of Prophylaxis for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Isolated Foot or Ankle Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bavand Bikdeli et al. Thromb Haemost. 2019 Oct.

Erratum in

  • Erratum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Thromb Haemost. 2019 Oct;119(10):e1. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702204. Epub 2020 May 18. Thromb Haemost. 2019. PMID: 32422665 No abstract available.

Abstract

Although prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is recommended after many surgeries, evidence base for use of VTE prophylaxis after foot or ankle surgery has been elusive, leading into varying guidelines recommendations and notable practice variations. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to determine if use of VTE prophylaxis decreased the frequency of subsequent VTE, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE), compared with control. We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov through May 2018, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective controlled observational studies of VTE prophylaxis in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. Our search retrieved 263 studies, of which 6 were finally included comprising 1,600 patients. Patients receiving VTE prophylaxis had lower risk for subsequent DVT (risk ratio [RR]: 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.55-0.94) and subsequent VTE (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.55-0.94). There was only one case of nonfatal PE, no cases of fatal PE, and no change in all-cause mortality (RR: 3.51; 95% CI: 0.14-84.84). There was no significant difference in the risk for bleeding (RR: 2.12; 95% CI: 0.53-8.56). Very few RCTs exist regarding the efficacy and safety of VTE prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery. Prophylaxis appears to reduce the risk of subsequent VTE, but the event rates are low and symptomatic events are rare. Future studies should determine the subgroups of patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery in whom prophylaxis may be most useful.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Behnood Bikdeli is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), through grant number T32 HL007854. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Behnood Bikdeli reports that he serves as an expert (on behalf of the plaintiff) for litigation related to inferior vena caval filters. The content of the current manuscript is not directly related to that litigation. None of the other authors report any conflict of interest.

MeSH terms

Substances