Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2019 Sep 3;8(17):e012307.
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012307. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

Presenting Symptoms in Men and Women Diagnosed With Myocardial Infarction Using Sex-Specific Criteria

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Presenting Symptoms in Men and Women Diagnosed With Myocardial Infarction Using Sex-Specific Criteria

Amy V Ferry et al. J Am Heart Assoc. .

Abstract

Background Sex-specific criteria are recommended for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction, but the impact of these on presenting characteristics is unknown. Methods and Results We evaluated patient-reported symptoms in 1941 patients (39% women) with suspected acute coronary syndrome attending the emergency department in a substudy of a prospective trial. Standardized criteria defined typical and atypical presentations based on pain nature, location, radiation, and additional symptoms. Diagnosis of myocardial infarction was adjudicated using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay with sex-specific thresholds (>16 ng/L women, >34 ng/L men). Patients identified who were missed by the contemporary assay with a uniform threshold (≥50 ng/L) were reclassified by this approach. Type 1 myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 16% (184/1185) of men and 12% (90/756) of women, with 9 (5%) men and 27 (30%) women reclassified using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and sex-specific thresholds. Chest pain was the presenting symptom in 91% (1081/1185) of men and 92% (698/756) of women. Typical symptoms were more common in women than in men with myocardial infarction (77% [69/90] versus 59% [109/184]; P=0.007), and differences were similar in those reclassified (74% [20/27] versus 44% [4/9]; P=0.22). The presence of ≥3 typical features was associated with a positive likelihood ratio for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women (positive likelihood ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.03-1.31) but not in men (positive likelihood ratio 1.09; 95% CI, 0.96-1.24). Conclusions Typical symptoms are more common and have greater predictive value in women than in men with myocardial infarction whether or not they are diagnosed using sex-specific criteria. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT01852123.

Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; chest pain; chest pain diagnosis; myocardial infarction; sex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Radar plot showing frequency of typical and atypical pain descriptors. Frequency of typical and atypical descriptors of pain, stratified by sex, in those with myocardial infarction (A, n=274) and without myocardial infarction (B, n=1667). Men are represented in blue; women are represented in red.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Positive likelihood ratios for the diagnosis of type 1 myocardial infarction of typical clinical features in men and women. Forest plot of the positive likelihood ratios and 95% CIs of 4 clinical features (pain nature, pain location, radiation, associated symptoms) in predicting the diagnosis of myocardial infarction.

Comment in

References

    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD; The Executive Group on behalf of the Joint European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/World Heart Federation (WHF) Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction . Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Circulation. 2018;138:e618–e651. - PubMed
    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction , Katus HA, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasché P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez‐Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2012;126:2020–2035. - PubMed
    1. Shah ASV, Anand A, Strachan FE, Ferry AV, Lee KK, Chapman AR, Sandeman D, Stables CL, Adamson PD, Andrews JPM, Anwar MS, Hung J, Moss AJ, O'Brien R, Berry C, Findlay I, Walker S, Cruikshank A, Reid A, Gray A, Collinson PO, Apple FS, McAllister DA, Maguire D, Fox KAA, Newby DE, Tuck C, Harkess R, Parker RA, Keerie C, Weir CJ, Mills NL. High‐sensitivity troponin in the evaluation of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a stepped‐wedge, cluster‐randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;392:919–928. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wenger NK. Women and coronary heart disease: a century after Herrick: understudied, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. Circulation. 2012;126:604–611. - PubMed
    1. Mehta L, Beckie T, Devon H, Krumholz H, Johnson M, Lindley K, Vaccarino V, Wang T, Watson K, Wenger N. Acute myocardial infarction in women: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133:916–947. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data