Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul;54(4):465-470.
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694022. Epub 2019 Aug 20.

The Effect of Graft Positions on the Stability of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Different Types of Subtrochanteric Shortening

Affiliations

The Effect of Graft Positions on the Stability of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Different Types of Subtrochanteric Shortening

Ethem Aytac Yazar et al. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2019 Jul.

Abstract

Objective The aim of the present study is to investigate the biomechanical stability of different subtrochanteric osteotomy types and graft positions in cases of dysplastic coxarthrosis that require total hip arthroplasty with shortening osteotomy, as well as to find out the most effective osteotomy type and graft position. Method Femur sawbones were used to compare different types of femoral shortening osteotomy (transverse, oblique, and step-cut). Strut grafts, which were prepared at the side of the subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy, were fixed in different positions (anterolateral, mediolateral, and anteroposterior). The fixation of the strut grafts was performed using two steel cables (with 2.0 mm of thickness) with the same strength. The failure values of composite femurs were recorded for axial and rotational loadings. Results Biomechanically, there were no statistically significant differences between the types of femoral subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy and the positions of the applied strut graft. Conclusion No superiority was observed between the types of femoral subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy regarding stability. Additionally, against stress, similar results were obtained for different strut graft positions. In conclusion, we believe that using the method in which the surgeon is experienced and that is the easiest to apply would be the best choice.

Keywords: arthroplasty, replacement, hip; bone transplantation; coxarthrosis; hip dislocation; osteotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflitos de Interesse Os autores declaram não haver conflitos de interesse.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Positions of the graft: anteroposterior, mediolateral and anterolateral.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Posição dos enxertos: ântero-posterior, medial-lateral e ântero-lateral.

References

    1. Ganey T M, Ogden J A. Filadélfia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007. Pre and postnatal development of the hip; p. 35.
    1. Barrack R L, Newland C C. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty with superior acetabular deficiency. Femoral head autograft technique and early clinical results. J Arthroplasty. 1990;5(02):159–167. - PubMed
    1. Steel H H. Triple osteotomy of the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55(02):343–350. - PubMed
    1. Wedge J H, Wasylenko M J. The natural history of congenital disease of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979;61-B(03):334–338. - PubMed
    1. Trousdale R T, Cabanela M E. Lessons learned after more than 250 periacetabular osteotomies. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74(02):119–126. - PubMed