Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Apr 1;95(5):924-931.
doi: 10.1002/ccd.28455. Epub 2019 Aug 21.

Technical consideration in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: A review of antithrombotic and PCI therapies

Affiliations
Review

Technical consideration in acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: A review of antithrombotic and PCI therapies

Guillaume Marquis-Gravel et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. .

Abstract

In this review, we report a contemporary appraisal of the available evidence focusing on adjunctive antithrombotic therapy and technical aspects of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMICS). Only few randomized trials have been conducted to evaluate the optimal arterial access choice, antithrombotic therapy, stent type, or the role of aspiration thrombectomy in this population. Observational data suggest that a transradial approach should be preferred for experienced operators, although knowledge and experience of transfemoral access is required to place any mechanical support device. In the absence of high-quality evidence to guide choice of the adjunctive antithrombotic drugs to support PCI in patients with AMICS, knowledge of the altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in shock is required to inform decisions. Drug-eluting stents should be favored over bare-metal stents, and routine thrombectomy is not encouraged. Owing to the challenges inherent to the conduct of randomized trials in this acutely ill patient population, concerted multicenter, and international efforts are paramount to orchestrate the development of high-quality evidence to guide clinical practice.

Keywords: anticoagulant; antiplatelet; aspiration thrombectomy; cardiogenic shock; percutaneous coronary intervention; radial access.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136(16):e232-e268.
    1. Scholz KH, Maier SKG, Maier LS, et al. Impact of treatment delay on mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients presenting with and without haemodynamic instability: results from the German prospective, multicentre FITT-STEMI trial. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(13):1065-1074.
    1. Thiele H, Akin I, Sandri M, et al. PCI strategies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. New Engl J Med. 2017;377(25):2419-2432.
    1. Backhaus T, Fach A, Schmucker J, et al. Management and predictors of outcome in unselected patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Bremen STEMI registry. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107(5):371-379.
    1. Campeau L. Percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography. Cath Cardiovasc Diagnosis. 1989;16(1):3-7.

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources