Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jul 26:11:101-113.
doi: 10.2147/JHL.S214765. eCollection 2019.

Physician engagement: a concept analysis

Affiliations

Physician engagement: a concept analysis

Tyrone A Perreira et al. J Healthc Leadersh. .

Abstract

The term "physician engagement" is used quite frequently, yet it remains poorly defined and measured. The aim of this study is to clarify the term "physician engagement." This study used an eight step-method for conducting concept analyses created by Walker and Avant. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched on February 14, 2019. No limitations were put on the searches with regard to year or language. Results identify that the term "physician engagement" is regular participation of physicians in (1) deciding how their work is done, (2) making suggestions for improvement, (3) goal setting, (4) planning, and (5) monitoring of their performance in activities targeted at the micro (patient), meso (organization), and/or macro (health system) levels. The antecedents of "physician engagement" include accountability, communication, incentives, interpersonal relations, and opportunity. The results include improved outcomes such as data quality, efficiency, innovation, job satisfaction, patient satisfaction, and performance. Defining physician engagement enables physicians and health care administrators to better appreciate and more accurately measure engagement and understand how to better engage physicians.

Keywords: concept analysis; engagement; medical; physician.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Attributes of physician engagement.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relationships between work environment, behaviors, and outcomes.
Figure 3
Figure 3
“Physician engagement” conceptual model.

References

    1. Milliken AD. Physician engagement: a necessary but reciprocal process. Can Med Assoc J. 2014;186:244–245. doi:10.1503/cmaj.131178 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taitz JM, Lee TH, Sequist TD. A framework for engaging physicians in quality and safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:722–728. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000167 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jarousse L. Physician engagement (getting your docs on board!). Hosp Health Net. 2014;88:41–47. - PubMed
    1. Scott CG, Theriault A, McGuire S, Samson A, Clement C, Worthington JR. Developing a physician engagement agreement at The Ottawa Hospital: a collaborative approach. Healthc Q. 2012;15:50–53. - PubMed
    1. Spaulding A, Gamm L, Menser T. Physician engagement: strategic considerations among leaders at a major health system. Hosp Top. 2014;92:66–73. doi:10.1080/00185868.2014.937970 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources