Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Oct;34(5):688-694.
doi: 10.1002/ncp.10396. Epub 2019 Aug 22.

High-Carbohydrate vs High-Fat Nutrition for Burn Patients

Affiliations
Review

High-Carbohydrate vs High-Fat Nutrition for Burn Patients

Beth A Shields et al. Nutr Clin Pract. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Nutrition is an essential component of the healing and recovery process after severe burn injury. For many burn patients, nutrition support is necessary to meet nutrition goals. The ratio of carbohydrates and fat is particularly important for burn patients, as an essential fatty acid deficiency can contribute to poor wound healing. However, there is evidence to suggest that diets containing more carbohydrates and less fat may result in better patient outcomes. A literature search was conducted to identify studies related to nutrition support and macronutrient ratios in burn patients. Eleven published papers were found that considered macronutrient use in enteral and parenteral nutrition therapies among 9 different burn patient samples. No negative outcomes associated with lower fat, higher carbohydrate nutrition for severely burned patients were found in the literature. Conversely, the literature review revealed improved outcomes among severely burned patients receiving lower fat, higher carbohydrate nutrition to include fewer incidences of pneumonia, wound infections, acute respiratory distress syndrome, fatty liver, and sepsis. These patients also experienced shorter hospital length of stay and shorter wound healing times, as well as lower spleen and kidney weights, lower urinary nitrogen losses, improved nitrogen balance, higher insulin levels, higher insulin-like growth factor-1, lower cortisol, and less muscle protein breakdown. The evidence available to date supports the clinical use of nutrition support providing ≤15% fat and ≥60% carbohydrate for critically ill burn patients.

Keywords: burns; carbohydrates; complications; critical illness; fats; length of stay; nutrition support.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Masters B, Wood F. Nutrition support in burns-is there consistency in practice? J Burn Care Res. 2008;29(4):561-571.
    1. Graves C, Saffle J, Cochran A. Actual burn nutrition care practices: an update. J Burn Care Res. 2009;30(1):77-82.
    1. Bernier J, Jobin N, Emptoz-Bonneton A, Pugeat MM, Garrel DR. Decreased corticosteroid-binding globulin in burn patients: relationship with interleukin-6 and fat in nutritional support. Crit Care Med. 1998;26(3):452-460.
    1. Garrel DR, Razi M, Larivière F, et al. Improved clinical status and length of care with low-fat nutrition support in burn patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1995;19(6):482-491.
    1. Gottschlich MM, Jenkins M, Warden GD, et al. Differential effects of three enteral dietary regimens on selected outcome variables in burn patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1990;14(3):225-236.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources