Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar;35(1):47-50.
doi: 10.2987/18-6774.1.

New County Records of Aedes aegypti and Aedes epactius in Colorado

Affiliations

New County Records of Aedes aegypti and Aedes epactius in Colorado

Erik M Ostrum et al. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2019 Mar.

Abstract

In August and September 2017, we conducted mosquito surveillance in southeastern Colorado by using ovitraps and larval sampling. The aim was to determine if there were established populations of Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus in the region. A single female Ae. aegypti was reared from eggs collected in La Junta, CO, but Ae. albopictus was not detected. Three other species were reared from eggs and/or larvae: Ae. epactius, Culex restuans, and Cx. pipiens. Aedes aegypti and Ae. epactius were detected for the 1st time in Otero and Baca counties, respectively, and these became new county records for Colorado. Both species were detected in very low numbers, suggesting extremely low population density or sporadic introductions into southeastern Colorado.

Keywords: Colorado.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The distribution of Ae. aegypti and Ae. epactius in Colorado after adding in our new records from the fall of 2017. The previous Ae. aegypti detection is represented by a darker blue shade (Pueblo County) and the new detection by a lighter blue (Otero County) shade. The previous Ae. epactius detections are represented by the darker grey shade (Larimer, Weld, Douglas and Montrose Counties) and new detection by the lighter gray shade (Baca County).

References

    1. Benedict MQ, Levine RS, Hawley WA, Lounibos LP. 2007. Spread of the tiger: global risk of invasion by the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 7:76–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calisher CH. 1983. Taxonomy, classification, and geographic distribution of California serogroup bunyaviruses pp, 1–16. In Calisher CH and Thompson WH (eds.) California serogroup viruses. Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, NY. - PubMed
    1. Carpenter SJ, LaCasse WJ. 1955. Mosquitoes of North America (North of Mexico). University of California Press; Berkeley and Los Angeles.
    1. CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]. 2017. CDC’s response to Zika: estimated range of Aedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti in the United States, 2017 [Internet]. Atlanta, GA: CDC; [accessed October 31, 2017]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/zika/vector/range.html
    1. Darsie RF Jr., Ward RA. 2005. Identification and geographic distribution of the mosquitoes of North America, North of Mexico. 2nd ed. Florida: University Press of Florida.

LinkOut - more resources