Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Feb;107(2):415-422.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.1616. Epub 2019 Sep 28.

Differential Effects of Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin on Platelet Reactivity and Coagulation Activation: A Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Differential Effects of Ticagrelor With or Without Aspirin on Platelet Reactivity and Coagulation Activation: A Randomized Trial in Healthy Volunteers

Ludwig Traby et al. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is standard in acute coronary heart disease but confers a bleeding risk. To compare the effects of ticagrelor-monotherapy with ticagrelor-based DAPT on hemostatic system activation, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in 44 volunteers using a loading-dose regimen and measured platelet-aggregometry triggered by adenosine diphosphate (multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA)-ADP) and arachidonic acid (MEA-AA), the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP), prothrombin fragment 1.2 (f1.2), and d-Dimer. Ticagrelor-based DAPT and ticagrelor-monotherapy significantly decreased MEA-ADP (Δmean: -51.4 (-56.9; -45.8) and -46.2 (-51.7; -40.7)) and VASP (Δmean: -70.3 (-76.2; -64.4) and -69.6 (-75.5; -63.7)) at 2 hours and over 24 hours. MEA-AA was reduced significantly by both treatments (Δmean: -72.9 (-80.6; -65.3) and -25.7 (-33.3; -18.0)) at 2 hours, and stronger by ticagrelor-based DAPT over 24 hours. Both treatments decreased f1.2 (geometric mean ratio (GMR): 0.92 (0.84; 1.01) and 0.88 (0.80; 0.96)) and d-Dimer (GMR: 0.89 (0.86; 0.92) and 0.91 (0.88; 0.94)) at 2 hours and d-Dimer over 24 hours. Ticagrelor-monotherapy and ticagrelor-based DAPT comparably affect hemostatic system activation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Jolanta M. Siller‐Matula reports lecture or consultant fees from Bayer, Astra Zeneca, Eli Lilly, Daiichi‐Sankyo, and Roche. All other authors declared no competing interests for this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Boxplots of the effects of ticagrelor combined with aspirin and ticagrelor combined with placebo on adenosine diphosphate‐triggered platelet aggregation (multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA)‐ADP) (a), arachidonic acid‐triggered aggregation (MEA‐AA) (b), and vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) levels (c) in venous blood at different time points over the observation period compared with baseline levels. *P < 0.05 for changes from baseline to 2 hours, from baseline to 24 hours, from 2 to 24 hours, and between treatment groups. n.s., nonsignificant; PRI, platelet reactivity index; U, units.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplot of the effects of ticagrelor combined with aspirin and ticagrelor combined with placebo on thromboxane B2 (TxB2) levels in venous blood at baseline and 24 hours after study treatment. *P < 0.05 for changes from baseline to 24 hours and between treatment groups. n.s., nonsignificant.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Boxplots of the effects of ticagrelor combined with aspirin and ticagrelor combined with placebo on prothrombin fragment 1.2 (f1.2) (a) and d‐Dimer (b) levels in venous blood at different time points over the observation period compared with baseline levels. *P < 0.05 for changes from baseline to 2 hours, from baseline to 24 hours, from 2 to 24 hours, and between treatment groups. n.s., nonsignificant.

References

    1. Go, A.S. et al Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 129, e28–e292 (2014). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nichols, M. , Townsend, N. , Scarborough, P. & Rayner, M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe 2014: epidemiological update. Eur. Heart J. 35, 2950–2959 (2014). - PubMed
    1. Alpert, J.S. , Thygesen, K. , Antman, E. & Bassand, J.P. Myocardial infarction redefined – a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 36, 959–969 (2000). - PubMed
    1. Widimsky, P. et al Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries. Eur. Heart J. 31, 943–957 (2009). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reed, G.W. , Rossi, J.E. & Cannon, C.P. Acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 389, 197–210 (2016). - PubMed

Publication types