Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Aug 15;11(8):1905.
doi: 10.3390/nu11081905.

The Effect of Diabetes-Specific Enteral Nutrition Formula on Cardiometabolic Parameters in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Omorogieva Ojo  1 , Sharon Marie Weldon  2   3 , Trevor Thompson  4 , Rachel Crockett  5 , Xiao-Hua Wang  6
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The Effect of Diabetes-Specific Enteral Nutrition Formula on Cardiometabolic Parameters in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Omorogieva Ojo et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of diabetes is on the increase in the UK and worldwide, partly due to unhealthy lifestyles, including poor dietary regimes. Patients with diabetes and other co-morbidities such as stroke, which may affect swallowing ability and lead to malnutrition, could benefit from enteral nutrition, including the standard formula (SF) and diabetes-specific formulas (DSF). However, enteral nutrition presents its challenges due to its effect on glycaemic control and lipid profile.

Aim: The aim of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of diabetes-specific enteral nutrition formula versus SF in managing cardiometabolic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Method: This review was conducted in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Three databases (Pubmed, EMBASE, PSYCInfo) and Google scholar were searched for relevant articles from inception to 2 January 2019 based on Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes and Study designs (PICOS) framework. Key words, Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms, and Boolean operators (AND/OR) formed part of the search strategy. Articles were evaluated for quality and risks of bias.

Results: Fourteen articles were included in the systematic review and five articles were selected for the meta-analysis. Based on the findings of the review and meta-analysis, two distinct areas were evident: the effect of DSF on blood glucose parameters and the effect of DSF on lipid profile. All fourteen studies included in the systematic review showed that DSF was effective in lowering blood glucose parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes compared with SF. The results of the meta-analysis confirmed the findings of the systematic review with respect to the fasting blood glucose, which was significantly lower (p = 0.01) in the DSF group compared to SF, with a mean difference of -1.15 (95% CI -2.07, -0.23) and glycated haemoglobin, which was significantly lower (p = 0.005) in the DSF group compared to the SF group following meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis. However, in relation to the sensitivity analysis for the fasting blood glucose, differences were not significant between the two groups when some of the studies were removed. Based on the systematic review, the outcomes of the studies selected to evaluate the effect of DSF on lipid profile were variable. Following the meta-analysis, no significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between the DSF and SF groups with respect to total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride. The level of the HDL cholesterol was significantly higher (p = 0.04) in the DSF group compared to the SF group after the intervention, with a mean difference of 0.09 (95% CI, 0.00, 0.18), although this was not consistent based on the sensitivity analysis. The presence of low glycaemic index (GI) carbohydrate, the lower amount of carbohydrate and the higher protein, the presence of mono-unsaturated fatty acids and the different amounts and types of fibre in the DSF compared with SF may be responsible for the observed differences in cardiometabolic parameters in both groups.

Conclusion: The results provide evidence to suggest that DSF is effective in controlling fasting blood glucose and glycated haemoglobin and in increasing HDL cholesterol, but has no significant effect on other lipid parameters. However, our confidence in these findings would be increased by additional data from further studies.

Keywords: diabetes specific formula; enteral nutrition; enteral tube feeding; fasting blood glucose; glycated haemoglobin; lipids; standard formula; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow chart on selection and inclusion of studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias summary.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The effect of DSF on fasting blood glucose (mmol/L).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The effect of DSF on Glycated Haemoglobin %.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The effect of DSF on total cholesterol (mmol/L).
Figure 6
Figure 6
The effect of DSF on LDL cholesterol (mmol/L).
Figure 7
Figure 7
The effect of DSF on Triglycerides (mmol/L).
Figure 8
Figure 8
The effect of DSF on HDL cholesterol (mmol/L).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. DeFronzo R.A., Ratner R.E., Han J., Kim D.D., Fineman M.S., Baron A.D. Effects of exenatide (exendin-4) on glycemic control and weight over 30 weeks in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1092–1100. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.5.1092. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jansink R., Braspenning J., Laurant M., Keizer E., Elwyn G., Weijden T.D., Grol R. Minimal improvement of nurses’ motivational interviewing skills in routine diabetes care one year after training: A cluster randomized trial. BMC Fam. Pract. 2013;14:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-44. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions (NCCCC) Type 2 Diabetes: National Clinical Guideline for Management in Primary and Secondary Care (Update) Royal College of Physicians; London, UK: 2008. - PubMed
    1. Public Health England 3.8 Million People in England Now Have Diabetes. [(accessed on 1 February 2019)];2016 Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/38-million-people-in-england-now-have....
    1. National Health Service (NHS) Digital and Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership National diabetes audit, 2015–2016 Report 1: Care Processes and Treatment Targets. [(accessed on 1 February 2019)];2017 Available online: http://www.content.digital.nhs.uk/catalogue/PUB23241/nati-diab-rep1-audi....

MeSH terms