Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Aug 23;19(1):321.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1755-z.

The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review

Sarah Lerchenfeldt  1 , Misa Mi  2 , Marty Eng  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review

Sarah Lerchenfeldt et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Peer evaluation can provide valuable feedback to medical students, and increase student confidence and quality of work. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the utilization, effectiveness, and quality of peer feedback during collaborative learning in medical education.

Methods: The PRISMA statement for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analysis was used to guide the process of conducting the systematic review. Evaluation of level of evidence (Colthart) and types of outcomes (Kirkpatrick) were used. Two main authors reviewed articles with a third deciding on conflicting results.

Results: The final review included 31 studies. Problem-based learning and team-based learning were the most common collaborative learning settings. Eleven studies reported that students received instruction on how to provide appropriate peer feedback. No studies provided descriptions on whether or not the quality of feedback was evaluated by faculty. Seventeen studies evaluated the effect of peer feedback on professionalism; 12 of those studies evaluated its effectiveness for assessing professionalism and eight evaluated the use of peer feedback for professional behavior development. Ten studies examined the effect of peer feedback on student learning. Six studies examined the role of peer feedback on team dynamics.

Conclusions: This systematic review indicates that peer feedback in a collaborative learning environment may be a reliable assessment for professionalism and may aid in the development of professional behavior. The review suggests implications for further research on the impact of peer feedback, including the effectiveness of providing instruction on how to provide appropriate peer feedback.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SL: The author declares that she has no competing interests.

ME: The author declares that he has no competing interests.

MM: The author declares that she has no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of Study Selection Process
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chen LP, Gregory JK, Camp CL, Juskewitch JE, Pawlina W, Lachman N. Learning to lead: self- and peer evaluation of team leaders in the human structure didactic block. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:210–217. doi: 10.1002/ase.101. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Souba WW, Day DV. Leadership values in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2006;81:20–26. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200601000-00007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cestone CM, Levine RE, Lane DR. Team-based learning: small group Learning’s next big step. In: Michaelsen LK, Fink LD, editors. New directions for teaching and learning. San Francisco: Wiley Periodicals, Inc.; 2008. pp. 69–78.
    1. Parikh A, Mcreelis K, Hodges B. Student feedback in problem based learning : a survey of 103 final year students across five Ontario medical schools. Med Educ. 2001;35:632–636. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00994.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sullivan ME, Hitchcock MA, Dunnington GL. Peer and self assessment during problem-based tutorials. Am J Surg. 1999;177(3):266–269. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(99)00006-9. - DOI - PubMed