Comparing videolaryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in obstetric patients

Affiliations

¹ Institute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Electronic address: tatjanas38@gmail.com.
² Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
³ Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

Comment

T Stopar Pintaric et al. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020 Feb.

. 2020 Feb:41:119-120.

doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Aug 3.

¹ Institute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Electronic address: tatjanas38@gmail.com.
² Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
³ Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.

No abstract available

Comment on

A randomised comparison of C-MAC™ and King Vision® videolaryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in 180 obstetric patients.
Blajic I, Hodzovic I, Lucovnik M, Mekis D, Novak-Jankovic V, Stopar Pintaric T. Blajic I, et al. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 Aug;39:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 29. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019. PMID: 30777368 Clinical Trial.
Comparing videolaryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in obstetric patients.
Liu SH, Shao LJ, Xue FS. Liu SH, et al. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020 Feb;41:118-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Aug 3. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020. PMID: 31445789 No abstract available.