Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Feb;27(2):265-272.
doi: 10.1111/ene.14071. Epub 2019 Sep 18.

Progression of behavioural disturbances in frontotemporal dementia: a longitudinal observational study

M Cosseddu  1 , A Benussi  2 , S Gazzina  2 , A Alberici  1 , V Dell'Era  2 , M Manes  2 , V Cristillo  2 , B Borroni  2 , A Padovani  2
Affiliations
Observational Study

Progression of behavioural disturbances in frontotemporal dementia: a longitudinal observational study

M Cosseddu et al. Eur J Neurol. 2020 Feb.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Behavioural disturbances are the core features of frontotemporal dementia (FTD); however, symptom progression is still not well characterized during the entire course of the disease. The aim of the present study was to investigate behavioural symptoms at baseline and during the disease course in a large cohort of patients with behavioural variant FTD (bvFTD), non-fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) and semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (PPA).

Methods: We evaluated 403 patients with FTD, 167 of whom had at least 1-year follow-up evaluation (for a total of 764 assessments). Behavioural symptoms were assessed and rated through the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and Frontal Behavioural Inventory (FBI). Disease severity was evaluated through the Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration -Clinical Dementia Rating scale (FTLD-CDR). Linear mixed models were used to model behavioural measures (NPI, FBI and the five FBI-behavioural core criteria scores) as a function of disease severity (FTLD-CDR score) and clinical phenotype.

Results: At baseline, patients with bvFTD showed more behavioural disturbances compared with those with nfvPPA (P = 0.004). Negative symptoms (apathy and loss of empathy) showed a trend to an increase throughout the course of the disease in both bvFTD and PPA (P < 0.001 until intermediate stages). Positive symptoms (disinhibition, perseverations and hyperorality) increased until intermediate phases (P < 0.001) followed by a progressive reduction in later phases, whereas they were less common in nfvPPA throughout the disease course.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that behavioural disturbances differed in FTD and with disease severity. Positive symptoms appeared to improve in the advanced stages, highlighting the importance of taking into account the disease severity as outcome measure in clinical trials.

Keywords: behavioural symptoms; disease progression; frontotemporal dementia; primary progressive aphasia.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 2011; 134: 2456-2477.
    1. Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 2011; 76: 1006-1014.
    1. Liu W, Miller BL, Kramer JH, et al. Behavioural disorders in the frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 2004; 62: 742-748.
    1. Snowden JS, Bathgate D, Varma A, Blackshaw A, Gibbons ZC, Neary D. Distinct behavioural profiles in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 70: 323-332.
    1. Bozeat S, Gregory C, Ralph M, Hodges JR. Which neuropsychiatric and behavioural features distinguish frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer's disease? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69: 178-186.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources