Predicting Progression in Parkinson's Disease Using Baseline and 1-Year Change Measures
- PMID: 31450510
- PMCID: PMC6839498
- DOI: 10.3233/JPD-181518
Predicting Progression in Parkinson's Disease Using Baseline and 1-Year Change Measures
Abstract
Background: Improved prediction of Parkinson's disease (PD) progression is needed to support clinical decision-making and to accelerate research trials.
Objectives: To examine whether baseline measures and their 1-year change predict longer-term progression in early PD.
Methods: Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative study data were used. Participants had disease duration ≤2 years, abnormal dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging, and were untreated with PD medications. Baseline and 1-year change in clinical, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and imaging measures were evaluated as candidate predictors of longer-term (up to 5 years) change in Movement Disorders Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) score and DAT specific binding ratios (SBR) using linear mixed-effects models.
Results: Among 413 PD participants, median follow-up was 5 years. Change in MDS-UPDRS from year-2 to last follow-up was associated with disease duration (β= 0.351; 95% CI = 0.146, 0.555), male gender (β= 3.090; 95% CI = 0.310, 5.869), and baseline (β= -0.199; 95% CI = -0.315, -0.082) and 1-year change (β= 0.540; 95% CI = 0.423, 0.658) in MDS-UPDRS; predictors in the model accounted for 17.6% of the variance in outcome. Predictors of percent change in mean SBR from year-2 to last follow-up included baseline rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder score (β= -0.6229; 95% CI = -1.2910, 0.0452), baseline (β= 7.232; 95% CI = 2.268, 12.195) and 1-year change (β= 45.918; 95% CI = 35.994,55.843) in mean striatum SBR, and 1-year change in autonomic symptom score (β= -0.325;95% CI = -0.695, 0.045); predictors in the model accounted for 44.1% of the variance.
Conclusions: Baseline clinical, CSF, and imaging measures in early PD predicted change in MDS-UPDRS and dopamine-transporter binding, but the predictive value of the models was low. Adding the short-term change of possible predictors improved the predictive value, especially for modeling change in dopamine-transporter binding.
Keywords: Parkinson’s disease; biomarkers; disease progression; surrogate endpoint.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors report conflicts of interest related to the research covered in this article.
References
-
- Post B, Merkus MP, de Haan RJ, Speelman JD, CARPA Study Group (2007) Prognostic factors for the progression of Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review. Mov Disord 22, 1839–1851; quiz 1988. - PubMed
-
- Reinoso G, Allen JC Jr, Au WL, Seah SH, Tay KY, Tan LC (2015) Clinical evolution of Parkinson’s disease and prognostic factors affecting motor progression: 9-year follow-up study. Eur J Neurol 22, 457–463. - PubMed
-
- Simuni T, Caspell-Garcia C, Coffey C, Lasch S, Tanner C, Marek K, PPMI Investigators (2016) How stable are Parkinson’s disease subtypes in de novo patients: Analysis of the PPMI cohort? Parkinsonism Relat Disord 28, 62–67. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous