Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Aug 28;19(1):121.
doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0587-4.

Pancreaticoduodenectomy versus limited resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Pancreaticoduodenectomy versus limited resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zefeng Shen et al. BMC Surg. .

Abstract

Background: By comparing the long-term prognostic outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and limited resection (LR), this study aimed to investigate the optimal surgical modality for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

Methods: Two authors independently searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for published articles comparing the long-term prognostic and clinicopathological factors of duodenal GIST patients undergoing PD versus LR. Relevant information was extracted and analyzed.

Results: After screening, 10 items comprising 623 cases were eventually included. This meta-analysis explicitly indicated that PD treatment was associated with worse long-term prognosis (hazard ratio = 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-2.69; p < 0.001; I2 = 0) and more complications (odds ratio [OR] = 2.90; 95% CI, 1.90-4.42; p < 0.001; I2 = 10%) than LR treatment. Nevertheless, for duodenal GISTs, PD was related to the following clinicopathological features: invasion of the second part of the duodenum (OR = 3.39; 95% CI, 1.69-6.79; p < 0.001; I2 = 50%), high-degree tumor mitosis (> 5/50 high-power fields; OR = 2.24; 95% CI, 1.42-3.52; p < 0.001; I2 = 0), and high-risk classification (OR = 3.17; 95% CI; 2.13-4.71; p < 0.001; I2 = 0).

Conclusions: Since PD is associated with worse long-term prognosis and more complications, its safety and efficacy should be ascertained. Our findings recommend the use of LR to obtain negative incision margins when conditions permit it.

Keywords: Duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors; Limited resection; Meta-analysis; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of literature screening process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot comparing the long-term prognostic outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and limited resection (LR)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Egger’s funnel plot for publication bias test comparing the curative effects of the different surgical groups

References

    1. Joensuu H, Fletcher C, Dimitrijevic S, Silbermand S, Roberts P, Demetri G. Management of malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Lancet Oncol. 2002;3(11):655–664. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(02)00899-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Corless CL, Barnett CM, Heinrich MC. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: origin and molecular oncology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:71. doi: 10.1038/nrc3143. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joensuu H, Vehtari A, Jaakko Riihimäki NT, Steigen SE, Brabec P, et al. Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(3):265–274. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70299-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coe TM, Fero KE, Fanta PT, Mallory RJ, Tang CM, Murphy JD, et al. Population-based epidemiology and mortality of small malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20(6):1132–1140. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3134-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kukar M, Kapil A, Papenfuss W, Groman A, Grobmyer SR, Hochwald SN. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) at uncommon locations: a large population based analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2015;111(6):696–701. doi: 10.1002/jso.23873. - DOI - PubMed