Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Aug 27;9(1):12428.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48805-x.

Non-diagnostic Results of Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy: A Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Non-diagnostic Results of Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy: A Meta-analysis

Kum Ju Chae et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Non-diagnostic results can affect the diagnostic performance of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) but have not been critically meta-analyzed yet. To meta-analyze the incidence and malignancy rate of non-diagnostic results, 3-by-2 table approaches rather than the conventional 2-by-2 approaches are needed to know its impact on the diagnostic performance of PTNB. A systematic literature search identified studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of PTNB with extractable outcomes. A total of 143 studies with 35,059 biopsies were included. The pooled incidence of non-diagnostic results was 6.8% (95% CI, 6.0-7.6%; I2 = 0.91). The pooled malignancy rate of non-diagnostic results was 59.3% (95% CI, 51.7-66.8%; I2 = 0.80), and was correlated with the prevalence of malignancy (correlation coefficient, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91). Pooled percentage decrease of sensitivity and specificity due to non-diagnostic results were 4.5% (95% CI, 3.2-5.7%; I2 = 0.64) and 10.7% (95% CI, 7.7-13.7%; I2 = 0.70), respectively, and the pooled incidence of non-diagnostic results was 4.4% (95% CI, 3.2-5.8%; I2 = 0.83) in lesions ultimately diagnosed as malignancies and 10.4% (95% CI, 7.5-13.8%; I2 = 0.74) in benign disease. In conclusion, non-diagnostic results averagely occurred in 6.8% of PTNB and more than half of the results were malignancies. The non-diagnostic results decreased specificity and sensitivity by 10.7% and 4.5%, respectively, demanding efforts to minimize the non-diagnostic results in PTNB.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. Non-financial competing interests: The authors declare no non-financial competing Interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the literature search.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of pathology reports of biopsy specimen in percutaneous thoracic needle biopsy.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Malignancy rate according to pathology reports of biopsy specimen in percutaneous thoracic needle biopsy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Percentage decrease of sensitivity of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy due to non-diagnostic results.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Percentage decrease of specificity of percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy due to non-diagnostic results.

References

    1. Manhire A, et al. Guidelines for radiologically guided lung biopsy. Thorax. 2003;58:920. doi: 10.1136/thorax.58.11.920. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rivera MP, Mehta AC, Wahidi MM. Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143:e142S–e165S. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2353. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hiraki T, et al. CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of 1,000 pulmonary lesions performed with 20-gauge coaxial cutting needles: Diagnostic yield and risk factors for diagnostic failure. Chest. 2009;136:1612–1617. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-0370. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee SM, et al. C-arm cone-beam CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of lung nodules: Clinical experience in 1108 patients. Radiology. 2014;271:291–300. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13131265. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Šimundić A-M. Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions. EJIFCC. 2009;19:203–211. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types