Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan;12(1):e1579.
doi: 10.1002/wnan.1579. Epub 2019 Aug 27.

Virus-like particles for vaccination against cancer

Affiliations
Review

Virus-like particles for vaccination against cancer

Mona O Mohsen et al. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

Active immunotherapy of cancer aims to treat the disease by inducing effective cellular and humoral immune responses. Virus-like particle-based vaccines have evolved dramatically over the last few decades, greatly reducing morbidity and mortality of several infectious diseases and expectedly preventing cervical cancer caused by human papilloma virus. In contrast to these broad successes of disease prevention, therapeutic cancer vaccines remain to demonstrate clinical benefit. Yet, several preclinical and clinical trials have revealed promising results and are paving the way for medical breakthroughs. This study reviews and discusses the recent preclinical development and clinical trials in this field. This article is categorized under: Biology-Inspired Nanomaterials > Protein and Virus-Based Structures Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Nanoscale Systems in Biology.

Keywords: cancer; vaccine; virus like particles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.O.M. and M.F.B. own shares of DeepVax GmbH involved in developing virus‐like particles‐based vaccines for cancer. D.E.S. and A.K. have declared no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A sketch illustrating some key characteristics of virus‐like particles (VLPs) as an efficient vaccine platform
Figure 2
Figure 2
Virus‐like particle (VLP)‐based vaccines and the induction of T cell responses. Following injection, a VLP‐based vaccine is taken up by dendritic cells and macrophages (1). The phagocytosed VLPs displaying the tumor antigen will be processed and presented on both MHC‐II (2) and MHC‐I (3) for recognition by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, respectively. Naïve CD8+ T cells will proliferate and differentiate into various types of effector and memory cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte (CTLs) (4). CTLs will initiate the killing process of tumor cells (5). Effector CD4+ TH1 cells enhance antigen presentation by antigen‐presenting cells and assist activated CTLs (6)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Virus‐like particle (VLP)‐based vaccines and the induction of B cell responses. The highly organized and repetitive surface geometry of a VLP‐based vaccine (1) facilitates its opsonization and phagocytosis by antigen‐presenting cells (2) as well as the engagement of CD21 on B cells (3). B cells also interact with and receive help from TH cells subsequent to uptake of VLP‐based vaccines via B cell receptor (4). This interaction between TH CD4+ T cells and B cells are essential for efficient generation of Ab‐producing plasma cells as well as for memory B cells (5). Many VLPs carry RNA packaged during production engaging TLR7/8 in B cells, promoting isotype‐switching towards protective TH1 IgG subclasses which will cause tumor cell destruction (6)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Vaccines in the context of check‐point inhibitors. Cancer immunotherapy targets immune checkpoints that regulates and inhibits the immune system. Monoclonal antibodies targeting (1) CTLA4 molecules on Tregs, for example, Ipilimumab (2) PD‐1 on T cells, for example, Nivolumab or Pembrolizumb (3) PDL‐1 on myeloid cells or/and tumor cells, for example, Atezolizumab have been approved by The food and drug administration (FDA) and are currently used in the clinics for treating different solid tumors. Combining a VLP‐based vaccine with checkpoint inhibitor is an optimal strategy to augment the immune response
Figure 5
Figure 5
Virus‐like particle (VLP)‐based vaccines against melanoma. (a) (1) Ovalbumin (OVA257–264) nonself epitope was fused to the C terminus of VP1 major coat protein of polyomavirus forming polyoma‐like particles of ~45 nm. (2) Tyrosinase‐related protein 2 (TRP2180–188) self‐epitope was fused to VP1 major coat protein forming polyoma‐like pentamers of ~9 nm. (b) Mix multi‐target VLP‐based vaccine consisting of germline and mutated CTL epitopes coupled to Qβ‐VLPs by Cu‐free click chemistry and loaded with B‐type CpGs (Mohsen, Vogel, et al., 2019). (c) A microcrystalline tyrosine crystal decorated with CuMVTT‐p33 nanoparticles labeled with AF488 (Mohsen, Heath, et al., 2019)
Figure 6
Figure 6
Virus‐like particle (VLP)‐based vaccines against breast cancer. (a) A schematic diagram of the structure of the HER‐2 receptor. The extracellular part consists of four domains: Domain I, Domain II (CR1), Domain III and Domain IV (CR2). The other domains are single transmembrane domain, juxtra membrane domain, tyrosine‐kinase domain and finally a C‐terminal tail. (b) SpyTag/SpyCatcher VLP‐based vaccine based on displaying the subdomains I–IV of HER‐2 combined to SyCatcher covalently attached to AP205‐VLP outer surface fused to a SpyTag part
Figure 7
Figure 7
Virus‐like particle (VLP)‐based vaccines against cervical cancer. (a) A sketch illustrates human papilloma virus (HPV) VLP‐based vaccines: (1) VLP‐E7 was based on cloning the C‐terminal region of HPV‐E7 epitope “45–98” excluding the oncogenic domain OD to the C‐terminal of VP2 of IBDV‐VLP, while (2) VLP‐E7‐B was generated by inserting the HPV‐E7 epitope into the VP2 protein. (b) (1) E7 oligomers “50 nm” chemically coupled to Qβ‐VLPs “25–30 nm” using SMPH cross‐linker and loaded with nonmethylated CpGs, (2) E7 oligomers admixed with Qβ‐VLPs loaded with CpGs

References

    1. American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting . (2018). Intratumoral toll‐like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonist, CMP‐001, in combination with pembrolizumab can reverse resistance to PD‐1 inhibition in a phase Ib trial in subjects with advanced melanoma. Retrieved from http://www.abstractsonline.com/pp8/#!/4562/presentation/11133
    1. Arevalo, M. T. , Wong, T. M. , & Ross, T. M. (2016). Expression and purification of virus‐like particles for vaccination. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 112, e54041 10.3791/54041 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Attarwala, H. (2010). Role of antibodies in cancer targeting. Journal of Natural Science, Biology and Medicine, 1(1), 53–56. 10.4103/0976-9668.71675 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bachmann, M. F. , & Jennings, G. T. (2010). Vaccine delivery: A matter of size, geometry, kinetics and molecular patterns. Nature Reviews. Immunology, 10(11), 787–796. 10.1038/nri2868 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bachmann, M. F. , & Jennings, G. T. (2011). Therapeutic vaccines for chronic diseases: Successes and technical challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 366(1579), 2815–2822. 10.1098/rstb.2011.0103 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances