Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov;2(11):808-815.
doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0452-y. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

Social and population health science approaches to understand the human microbiome

Affiliations

Social and population health science approaches to understand the human microbiome

Pamela Herd et al. Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Nov.

Abstract

The microbiome is now considered our 'second genome' with potentially comparable importance to the genome in determining human health. There is, however, a relatively limited understanding of the broader environmental factors, particularly social conditions, that shape variation in human microbial communities. Fulfilling the promise of microbiome research - particularly the microbiome's potential for modification - will require collaboration between biologists and social and population scientists. For life scientists, the plasticity and adaptiveness of the microbiome calls for an agenda to understand the sensitivity of the microbiome to broader social environments already known to be powerful predictors of morbidity and mortality. For social and population scientists, attention to the microbiome may help answer nagging questions about the underlying biological mechanisms that link social conditions to health. We outline key substantive and methodological advances that can be made if collaborations between social and population health scientists and life scientists are strategically pursued.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1 |
Fig. 1 |. Proposed relationships between social conditions, the gut microbiome, and morbidity and mortality.
Note: this figure is not intended to be a comprehensive overview of all possible causal relationships. It suggests where social and population health scientists are best positioned to contribute to microbiome research, focusing particularly on the possible pathways between social conditions and the gut microbiome.

References

    1. Clemente JC, Ursell LK, Parfrey LW & Knight R The impact of the gut microbiota on human health: an integrative view. Cell 148, 1258–1270 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grice EA & Segre JA The human microbiome: our second genome. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 13, 151–170 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lozupone CA, Stombaugh JI, Gordon JI, Jansson JK & Knight R Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota. Nature 489, 220–230 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cho I & Blaser MJ The human microbiome: at the interface of health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 260–270 (2012). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sender R, Fuchs S & Milo R Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002533 (2016). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms