Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 15;3(10):13183-13194.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01837. eCollection 2018 Oct 31.

Chitosan-Thiobarbituric Acid: A Superadsorbent for Mercury

Affiliations

Chitosan-Thiobarbituric Acid: A Superadsorbent for Mercury

Rahul Bhatt et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

In the present investigation, chitosan (CH) was supramolecularly cross-linked with thiobarbituric acid to form CT. CT was well characterized by UV, scanning electron microscopy-energy-dispersive X-ray analysis, Fourier transform infrared, NMR, differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, and X-ray diffraction analyses, and its adsorption potential for elemental mercury (Hg0), inorganic mercury (Hg2+), and methyl mercury (CH3Hg+) was investigated. Adsorption experiments were conducted to optimize the parameters for removal of the mercury species under study, and the data were analyzed using Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin adsorption isotherm models. CT was found to have high adsorption capacities of 1357.69, 2504.86, and 2475.38 mg/g for Hg0, Hg2+, and CH3Hg+, respectively. The adsorbent CT could be reused up to three cycles by eluting elemental mercury using 0.01 N thiourea, inorganic mercury using 0.01 N perchloric acid, and methyl mercury with 0.2 N NaCl.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Synthesis of CT Adsorbent
Figure 1
Figure 1
FTIR analysis of CH, CT, and mercury-loaded CT.
Figure 2
Figure 2
EDX spectra of (a) CT, (b) CT-Hg0, (c) CT-Hg2+, and (d) CT-CH3Hg+.
Figure 3
Figure 3
NMR analysis.
Figure 4
Figure 4
DSC analysis.
Figure 5
Figure 5
XRD analysis.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Effect of pH variation.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Effect of Time Variation on the adsorption of the mercury species under study onto CT.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Desorption Studies of CT-Hg0, CT-Hg2+, and CT-CH3Hg+.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Uptake of Different Metals onto CT.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Uptake of different metals in a synthetic mixture containing Hg2+, CH3Hg+, Cu2+, Cd2+, Pb2+ and Zn2+.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2. Elemental Mercury Uptake Procedure

References

    1. Bhatnagar A.; Sillanpää M. Applications of Chitin- and Chitosan-Derivatives for the Detoxification of Water and Wastewater — A Short Review. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009, 152, 26–38. 10.1016/j.cis.2009.09.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vieira R. S.; Oliveira M. L. M.; Guibal E.; Rodríguez-Castellón E.; Beppu M. M. Copper, Mercury and Chromium Adsorption on Natural and Crosslinked Chitosan Films: An XPS Investigation of Mechanism. Colloids Surf., A 2011, 374, 108–114. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.11.022. - DOI
    1. Lu X.; Huangfu X.; Zhang X.; Wang Y.; Ma J. Strong Enhancement of Trace Mercury Removal from Aqueous Solution with Sodium Thiosulfate by in Situ Formed Mn- (Hydr) Oxides. Water Res. 2014, 65, 22–31. 10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.016. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jonsson S.; Skyllberg U.; Nilsson M. B.; Westlund P.; Shchukarev A.; Lundberg E.; Bjo E. Mercury Methylation Rates for Geochemically Relevant HgII Species in Sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 11653–11659. 10.1021/es3015327. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang J. R.; Huang W. T.; Zeng A. L.; Luo H. Q.; Li N. B. Ethynyl and π-Stacked Thymine–Hg2+–thymine Base Pairs Enhanced Fluorescence Quenching via Photoinduced Electron Transfer and Simple and Sensitive Mercury Ion Sensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 64, 597–604. 10.1016/j.bios.2014.09.092. - DOI - PubMed