Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 31;3(12):18943-18949.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b02978.

Uniform Vapor-Pressure-Based Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of MoS2 Using MoO3 Thin Film as a Precursor for Coevaporation

Affiliations

Uniform Vapor-Pressure-Based Chemical Vapor Deposition Growth of MoS2 Using MoO3 Thin Film as a Precursor for Coevaporation

Sajeevi S Withanage et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is a powerful method employed for high-quality monolayer crystal growth of 2D transition metal dichalcogenides with much effort invested toward improving the growth process. Here, we report a novel method for CVD-based growth of monolayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) by using thermally evaporated thin films of molybdenum trioxide (MoO3) as the molybdenum (Mo) source for coevaporation. Uniform evaporation rate of MoO3 thin films provides uniform Mo vapors which promote highly reproducible single-crystal growth of MoS2 throughout the substrate. These high-quality crystals are as large as 95 μm and are characterized by scanning electron microscopy, Raman spectroscopy, photoluminescence spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. The bottom-gated field-effect transistors fabricated using the as-grown single crystals show n-type transistor behavior with a good on/off ratio of 106 under ambient conditions. Our results presented here address the precursor vapor control during the CVD process and is a major step forward toward reproducible growth of MoS2 for future semiconductor device applications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental setup. (a) Schematic representation of the atmospheric pressure CVD setup and the relative S, MoO3, and substrate positioning. (b) Cross-sectional view of the substrate boat: target substrate was placed face down toward the film at a small distance d. (c) Temperature profile of MoO3 and S at a setpoint value of 750 °C.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Growth results. (a) Contrast between bare Si/SiO2 substrate and substrate after the growth of MoS2. (b) Sketch of the sample with the corresponding image positions. The blue regions marked here are outside of the boat. (c) Grain-size histogram with the surface coverage. (d) Optical images of the substrate at the positions specified in (b). Scale bar is 100 μm in each image.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Characterization of the MoS2 single crystals. (a) Optical image of one of the largest monolayer crystals observed. (b) SEM image of a single crystal. (c) AFM topography and height profile (inset) taken at an edge of a monolayer domain. (d) E2g1 and A1g vibrational modes of atoms and Raman single spectra for a single crystal.
Figure 4
Figure 4
PL characterization. (a) PL single spectra of a MoS2 crystal grown with the optimized growth recipe. (b) PL intensity mapping of A peak for the same crystal. Inset shows the mapping of B peak.
Figure 5
Figure 5
TEM characterization. (a) Low magnification DF-STEM image of the transferred thin film on the copper grid. (b) HRSTEM image of the monolayer MoS2 showing hexagonal atom arrangement. (c) DF-STEM image for the folded edge of the monolayer.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Electrical characteristics of the as-grown MoS2 single crystals. (a) Output characteristics of the transistor device by sweeping the gate voltage (VG) from −10 to 80 V. (b) Transfer characteristics. Plots are provided for the device shown in inset of (b).

References

    1. Cunningham G.; Khan U.; Backes C.; Hanlon D.; McCloskey D.; Donegan J. F.; Coleman J. N. Photoconductivity of solution-processed MoS2 films. J. Mater. Chem. C 2013, 1, 6899–6904. 10.1039/c3tc31402b. - DOI
    1. Perea-López N.; Elías A. L.; Berkdemir A.; Castro-Beltran A.; Gutiérrez H. R.; Feng S.; Lv R.; Hayashi T.; López-Urías F.; Ghosh S.; Muchharla B.; Talapatra S.; Terrones H.; Terrones M. Photosensor Device Based on Few-Layered WS2 Films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 5511–5517. 10.1002/adfm.201300760. - DOI
    1. Radisavljevic B.; Radenovic A.; Brivio J.; Giacometti V.; Kis A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 147–150. 10.1038/nnano.2010.279. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lopez-Sanchez O.; Lembke D.; Kayci M.; Radenovic A.; Kis A. Ultrasensitive photodetectors based on monolayer MoS2. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2013, 8, 497–501. 10.1038/nnano.2013.100. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salehzadeh O.; Tran N. H.; Liu X.; Shih I.; Mi Z. Exciton Kinetics, Quantum Efficiency, and Efficiency Droop of Monolayer MoS2 Light-Emitting Devices. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 4125–4130. 10.1021/nl5017283. - DOI - PubMed