Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Mar 5;4(3):4918-4926.
doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00283. eCollection 2019 Mar 31.

Highly Sensitive Ratiometric Fluorescent Paper Sensors for the Detection of Fluoride Ions

Affiliations

Highly Sensitive Ratiometric Fluorescent Paper Sensors for the Detection of Fluoride Ions

Xiaoming Wu et al. ACS Omega. .

Abstract

Two sensitive and ratiometric fluorescent probes (probe I and probe II) were developed for the detection of fluoride ions. Probe I can detect fluoride ions quantitatively within a range of 0-6 μM and a detection limit of 73 nM, while probe II has a range of 0-40 μM and a detection limit of 138 nM. The test strips from probe I are quickly able to recognize F- (5 min) inside of the F- safety level in drinking water (1.0 mg/L, ∼5 μM) under 254 nm ultraviolet light, and the test strips from probe II quickly recognize F- (12 min) in dangerously high F- levels in water (4.0 mg/L, ∼21 μM) under 254 nm ultraviolet light. This combination of fluorescent paper sensors from probe I and probe II can be used as a simple and convenient tool to determine whether water is safe to drink or dangerous.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Scheme 1
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Probe I and Probe II
Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Fluorescent spectra of probe I (10 μM) in different buffer solutions (pH, 3–12) with DMSO (v/v = 3:1) at 25 °C; (b) fluorescent spectra of probe I (10 μM) added to F (300 μM) in different buffer solutions (pH, 3–12) with DMSO (v/v = 3:1) at 25 °C; (c) fluorescent spectra of probe II (10 μM) in different buffer solutions (pH, 3–12) with DMSO (v/v = 3:1) at 25 °C; (d) fluorescent spectra of probe II (10 μM) added to F (300 μM) in different buffer solutions (pH, 3–12) with DMSO (v/v = 3:1) at 25 °C; (e) fluorescent spectra of probe I (10 μM) added to F (300 μM) in different solvents (CH3CN, DMSO, and C2H5OH) with H2O (v/v = 3:1); (f) fluorescent spectra of probe II (10 μM) added to F (300 μM) in different solvents (CH3CN, DMSO, and C2H5OH) with H2O (v/v = 3:1).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Fluorescence spectra of probe I (10 μM) with F (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, 40, and 60 μM); (b) photograph of probe I solutions (10 μM) subjected to F (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 μM) under ambient light and 365 nm UV light; (c) fluorescence spectra of probe II (10 μM) with F (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100 μM); (d) photograph of probe II solutions (10 μM) subjected to F (0, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 μM) under ambient light and 365 nm UV light; (e) time-dependent fluorescence spectra of probe I (10 μM) in the presence of F (3 μM) in DMSO with H2O (v/v, 3:1) at 25 °C. Tests were performed in triplicate; (f) time-dependent fluorescence spectra of probe II (10 μM) in the presence of F (20 μM) in DMSO with H2O (v/v, 3:1) at 25 °C. Tests were performed in triplicate.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Fluorescence spectra of probe I (10 μM) with F (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 μM); (b) plot of fluorescence intensity of probe I differences with F ranging from 0 to 6 μM; (c) fluorescence spectra of probe II (10 μM) with F (0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 μM); (d) plot of fluorescence intensity of probe II differences with F ranging from 0 to 35 μM.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Fluorescence intensity change of probe I (10 μM) upon addition of various species (10 μM for each. 1, blank; 2, Cu2+; 3, Ca2+; 4, K+; 5, Na+; 6, Mg2+; 7, HS; 8, HSO3; 9, SO32–; 10, SO42–; 11, Fe2+; 12, NH4+; 13, Cl; 14, Br; 15, I; 16, H2O2; 17, Cys; 18, GSH; 19, Hcy; 20, Fe3+; 21, Glu. 4 μM for F). Tests were performed in triplicate; (b) fluorescence intensity change of probe II (10 μM) upon addition of various species (10 μM for each. 1, blank; 2, Cu2+; 3, Ca2+; 4, K+; 5, Na+; 6, Mg2+; 7, HS; 8, HSO3; 9, SO32–; 10, SO42–; 11, Fe2+; 12, NH4+; 13, Cl; 14, Br; 15, I; 16, H2O2; 17, Cys; 18, GSH; 19, Hcy; 20, Fe3+; 21, Glu. 20 μM for F). Tests were performed in triplicate.
Figure 5
Figure 5
1H NMR titration spectra of probe I-F.
Figure 6
Figure 6
HPLC spectra of probe II-F.
Scheme 2
Scheme 2. Mechanism for Reaction of Probe I and Probe II with F
Figure 7
Figure 7
(a) Photograph of the test strips PI-A subjected to F (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 μM) under ambient light and 254 nm UV light; (b) photograph of the test strips PI-B subjected to F (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 μM) under ambient light and 254 nm UV light; (c) photograph of the test strips PII subjected to F (0, 3, 6, 13, 21, and 27 μM) under ambient light and 254 nm UV light; (d) photograph of the test strips PII subjected to F (0, 3, 6, 13, 21, and 27 μM) under ambient light and 365 nm UV light.

References

    1. Zhou Y.; Zhang J. F.; Yoon J. Fluorescence and colorimetric chemosensors for fluoride-ion detection. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 5511–5571. 10.1021/cr400352m. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Craig L.; Lutz A.; Berry K. A.; Yang W. Recommendations for fluoride limits in drinking water based on estimated daily fluoride intake in the Upper East Region, Ghana. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 532, 127–137. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.05.126. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xiong X.; Liu J.; He W.; Xia T.; He P.; Chen X.; Yang K.; Wang A. Dose-effect relationship between drinking water fluoride levels and damage to liver and kidney functions in children. Environ. Res. 2007, 103, 112–116. 10.1016/j.envres.2006.05.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang L.; Huang D.; Yang J.; Wei X.; Qin J.; Ou S.; Zhang Z.; Zou Y. Probabilistic risk assessment of Chinese residents’ exposure to fluoride in improved drinking water in endemic fluorosis areas. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 222, 118–125. 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.12.074. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dai S.; Li W.; Tang Y.; Zhang Y.; Feng P. The sources, pathway, and preventive measures for fluorosis in Zhijin County, Guizhou, China. Appl. Geochem. 2007, 22, 1017–1024. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2007.02.011. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources