Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;144(3):378e-385e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005909.

The Probable Reasons for Dorsal Hump Problems following Let-Down/Push-Down Rhinoplasty and Solution Proposals

Affiliations

The Probable Reasons for Dorsal Hump Problems following Let-Down/Push-Down Rhinoplasty and Solution Proposals

Umut Tuncel et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep.

Erratum in

Abstract

Background: Nasal hump relapse and its probable reasons or mechanisms have been less discussed after dorsal preservation rhinoplasty. In this article, the authors would like to share their experiences and offer solutions regarding this subject.

Methods: Five hundred twenty patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty between the years 2016 and 2018 were included in the study. The push-down method was used for noses with a hump less than 4 mm and the let-down procedure was performed for others. Hump height was measured from profile photographs. The cases were evaluated in terms of nasal dorsal problems and their probable mechanisms.

Results: Five hundred twenty patients, 448 with a straight nose and 72 with a deviated nose, were enrolled in this study. Mean follow-up was 13 months (range, 9 to 16 months). Visible dorsal hump recurrence was observed in 63 patients, and they appeared at 1 to 4 months postoperatively. Forty-one of these had a dorsal hump more than 4 mm preoperatively. Hump recurrence was not more than 2 mm in 34 patients, and they did not wish to have any revision intervention because of cosmetic satisfaction. In 11 cases, the height of the hump recurrence was 2 to 3 mm. These patients were treated with only minimal rasping. The remaining 18 patients had a hump recurrence with a height of 3 to 4 mm. They underwent secondary surgery using let-down rhinoplasty.

Conclusion: The authors recommend subperichondrial/subperiosteal dissection, subdorsal excision of cartilaginous and bony septum, scoring the resting upper part of the septum just below the keystone area, and performing lateral keystone dissection and preferring let-down procedure for kyphotic noses to prevent hump relapse after dorsal preservation rhinoplasty.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Tuncel U. Rhinoplasty in the Black Sea region. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23:1355–1357.
    1. Cobo R. Correction of dorsal abnormalities in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg. 2008;24:327–338.
    1. Barrett DM, Casanueva F, Wang T. Understanding approaches to the dorsal hump. Facial Plast Surg. 2017;33:125–132.
    1. Constantinidis J, Fyrmpas G. Reinserting the hump in primary rhinoplasty: The gain is three-fold. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2016;4:e1021.
    1. Cottle MH. Nasal roof repair and hump removal. AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1954;60:408–414.

LinkOut - more resources