A housing mobility program's impacts on teen and young adult parenting
- PMID: 31463353
- PMCID: PMC6706675
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100451
A housing mobility program's impacts on teen and young adult parenting
Erratum in
-
Erratum regarding missing Declaration of Competing Interest statements in previously published articles.SSM Popul Health. 2020 Dec 17;12:100709. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100709. eCollection 2020 Dec. SSM Popul Health. 2020. PMID: 33381632 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program (MTO) implemented in 1994 in five U.S. cities (Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, and New York City) on teen births.
Methods: We analyzed baseline and long-term evaluation data for youth (ages 13-20) and young adults (ages 21-30) (N = 7861) who were children or teens at baseline. We used regression analyses to estimate the impact of housing vouchers on having a teen birth.
Results: Overall, MTO had no significant effect on teen births. However, among young adults whose parent had a child before age 20, the proportion with a teen birth themselves was 21% lower among those offered housing vouchers to low-poverty neighborhoods with no restrictions compared to those not offered housing vouchers (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: MTO appeared to decrease intergenerational teen births among young adults. Further exploration of housing relocation may help untangle risks and protective factors for reducing intergenerational teen births.
Public health implications: Reducing intergenerational teen births is important, especially among those facing economic, environmental, and health risks. Comprehensive programs addressing multiple social determinants of health are vital to reducing teen births.
Keywords: African Americans; Housing relocation; Neighborhood context; Poverty; Social determinants of health; Teen births; Teen pregnancy; United States.
References
-
- Angrist J.D., Imbens G.W., Rubin D.B. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1996;91(434):444–455.
-
- Chicago Housing Authority: 2011. The plan for transformation: An update on relocation.
-
- Breheny M., Stephens C. Breaking the cycle: Constructing intergenerational explanations for disadvantage. Journal of Health Psychology. 2008;13(6):754–763. - PubMed
-
- Campa M.I., Ekenrode J.J. Pathways to intergenerational adolescent childbearing in a high-risk sample. Journal of Marriage and Family. 2006;68(3):558–572.
-
- Chetty R., Hendren N., Katz L.F. The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the moving to opportunity experiment. The American Economic Review. 2016;106(4) - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
