Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep;55(9):1951-1964.
doi: 10.1037/dev0000727.

Age differences in emotion regulation strategy use, variability, and flexibility: An experience sampling approach

Lizbeth Benson  1 , Tammy English  2 , David E Conroy  3 , Aaron L Pincus  4 , Denis Gerstorf  5 , Nilam Ram  1
Affiliations

Age differences in emotion regulation strategy use, variability, and flexibility: An experience sampling approach

Lizbeth Benson et al. Dev Psychol. 2019 Sep.

Abstract

Life span developmental theories suggest that as individuals age, they accumulate knowledge about how to deploy emotion regulation (ER) strategies effectively and learn how to match their ER strategy use with changes in situational demands. Using an event-contingent experience sampling design wherein 150 adults Age 18 to 89 years reported on 64,213 social interactions (M = 427.41, SD = 145.66) during 9 weeks of daily life, this study examines (a) age-related differences in individuals' usual ER strategy use (reappraisal, suppression) during everyday social interactions, (b) age-related differences in how much individuals' use of these two strategies varies across social situations-ER variability, and (c) age-related differences in the extent to which ER strategy use covaries with relational (close vs. nonclose others) and emotional (happy, sad) contextual features of those social situations-ER flexibility. In line with a small body of prior work, usual ER strategy use did not differ across adulthood and ER variability was lower at older ages. Results from multilevel models of intraindividual covariation suggested that individuals flexibly matched their ER strategy implementation to changes in emotional context-especially when interacting with close others. The results also provided evidence that the intraindividual covariation between relational context and use of suppression was weaker at older ages. Beyond these specific findings, this study demonstrated the utility of experience sampling designs, event-contingent reports, and the measurement/modeling of intraindividual variation and covariation for study of emotional development across the life span. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Within person association between relational context and suppression moderated by age (−1SD = age 28 years, +1SD = age 66 years).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Within person association between emotional context (happy, sad) and ER strategy use (reappraisal, suppression) moderated by relational context (close vs. non-close other).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aldao A. (2013). The future of emotion regulation research: Capturing context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(2), 155–172. - PubMed
    1. Aldao A, & Nolen-Hoeksema S. (2012). The influence of context on the implementation of adaptive emotion regulation strategies. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 493–501. 10.1016/j.brat.2012.04.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aldao A, Sheppes G, & Gross JJ (2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(3), 263–278.
    1. Almeida DM, & Horn MC (2004). Is daily life more stressful during middle adulthood In Brim G, Ryff CD, & Kessler RC (Eds.), How healthy are we? A national study of well-being at midlife. (pp. 425–451). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    1. Antonucci TC, & Akiyama H. (1987). Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of the convoy model. Journal of Gerontology, 42(5), 519–527. - PubMed