Reply by Authors
- PMID: 31464565
- DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000516
Reply by Authors
Comment on
-
Re: Efficacy and Safety of Complete Intraureteral Stent Placement versus Conventional Stent Placement in Relieving Ureteral Stent Related Symptoms: A Randomized, Prospective, Single Blind, Multicenter Clinical Trial.J Urol. 2020 Jan;203(1):210. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000515. Epub 2019 Aug 29. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31464564 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2019 Jul;202(1):170. doi: 10.1097/01.JU.0000558169.76885.2e. Epub 2019 Jun 7. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31012793 No abstract available.
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2019 Jul;202(1):170. doi: 10.1097/01.JU.0000558168.69261.3a. Epub 2019 Jun 7. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31012792 No abstract available.
-
Re: Efficacy and Safety of Complete Intraureteral Stent Placement versus Conventional Stent Placement in Relieving Ureteral Stent Related Symptoms: A Randomized, Prospective, Single Blind, Multicenter Clinical Trial.J Urol. 2020 Jan;203(1):210. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000515. Epub 2019 Aug 29. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31464564 No abstract available.
-
Ureteral stents and flexible ureterorenoscopy.J Endourol. 1993 Apr;7(2):145-9. doi: 10.1089/end.1993.7.145. J Endourol. 1993. PMID: 8518828 Review.
-
[Pathology of the gynecologic ureter].Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2002 Mar;74(1):21-2. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2002. PMID: 12053444 Review. Italian.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources