Meta-analysis of the concordance of Icare® PRO-based rebound and Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients
- PMID: 31466475
- DOI: 10.1177/1120672119866067
Meta-analysis of the concordance of Icare® PRO-based rebound and Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients
Abstract
Background: The Icare® PRO rebound tonometer is being promoted as a patient-friendly device for glaucoma detection and monitoring, allowing rapid and accurate intraocular pressure measurement avoiding anaesthesia. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the concordance of Icare® PRO and Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma patients.
Methods: The German and English literature research was carried out using PubMed and Cochrane Library between January 2010 and March 2018. Method comparison trials in a paired sample study design were identified. Search criteria were 'Icare PRO', 'Rebound', 'Goldmann' and 'Applanation'. Adult patients with glaucoma of any aetiology were included. The intraindividual intraocular pressure deviation between Icare® PRO and Goldmann applanation tonometry (mm Hg) served as primary endpoint, parameterized by the reported mean differences. For each study, an asymptotic 95% confidence interval was derived. The overall intraocular pressure meta-difference (Icare® PRO-Goldmann applanation tonometry) and 95% confidence interval were estimated using the random effect model.
Result: Of 147 publications, 6 studies (672 eyes) were included after reviewing. Four studies showed an intraocular pressure underestimation by the Icare® PRO, two an overestimation. The meta-difference (Icare® PRO-Goldmann applanation tonometry = -0.14 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval: (-0.43 mm Hg; 0.15 mm Hg)) indicated a non-significant, clinically irrelevant mean deviation (p = 0.335). The devices showed good agreement, but there was a strong heterogeneity between the studies (I² = 77%): two studies presented a significant difference (Icare® PRO-Goldmann applanation tonometry), however, with deviations in opposite directions.
Conclusion: Although the manufacturer advertises the Icare® PRO as a 'tonometer with superior accuracy', the present review could neither confirm nor deny considerable agreement between Goldmann applanation tonometry and Icare® PRO in glaucomatous patients.
Keywords: Concordance; Goldmann applanation tonometry; glaucoma; rebound tonometry.
Similar articles
-
[Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare® Home rebound tonometer (model TA022) and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients].J Fr Ophtalmol. 2017 Dec;40(10):865-875. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Nov 22. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2017. PMID: 29174296 French.
-
Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 May-Jun;40(4):e163-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2011.02670.x. Epub 2011 Oct 20. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 21883774
-
Icare ONE rebound versus Goldmann applanation tonometry in children with known or suspected glaucoma.Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Nov;154(5):843-849.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.05.003. Epub 2012 Jul 27. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012. PMID: 22840485
-
[Is There Really Agreement between Rebound and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Methods? Results of a Systematic Review of the Period 01/2005 to 08/2014].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2015 Jul;232(7):850-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1545995. Epub 2015 Jun 25. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2015. PMID: 26110287 German.
-
New technologies for measuring intraocular pressure.Prog Brain Res. 2015;221:67-79. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Oct 1. Prog Brain Res. 2015. PMID: 26518073 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of travoprost and latanoprost for the management of open-angle glaucoma given as an evening dose.Exp Ther Med. 2020 Nov;20(5):24. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.9152. Epub 2020 Aug 28. Exp Ther Med. 2020. PMID: 32934689 Free PMC article.
-
Structural reversal of disc cupping measured in Bruch's membrane opening-based OCT morphometry after PRESERFLO microshunt implantation for open-angle glaucoma.BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Jan 17;25(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03838-3. BMC Ophthalmol. 2025. PMID: 39825263 Free PMC article.
-
A deep dive into the latest European Glaucoma Society and Asia-Pacific Glaucoma Society guidelines and their relevance to India.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan;70(1):24-35. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1762_21. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2022. PMID: 34937204 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical