Personalized Education to Increase Interest
- PMID: 31467466
- PMCID: PMC6715310
- DOI: 10.1177/0963721418793140
Personalized Education to Increase Interest
Abstract
A long-standing ideal of school education has been to connect instruction to a student's life outside school in order to render subject matter interesting. New technologies enable instructors to personalize learning materials to increase situational interest. After distinguishing three main methods to personalize education (context personalization, choice, and active personalization), we review recent intervention studies designed to increase situational interest, which is necessary for the emergence of individual interest. Across all three kinds of interventions, some studies point to the possibility of increasing interest for students low in initial interest. Despite progress in developing personalized interventions for school practice, research on the theoretical mechanisms behind the success of the interventions has just begun.
Keywords: choice; context personalization; interest; personalized education; utility-value intervention.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared that there were no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship or the publication of this article.
References
-
- Ainley M, Hidi S, & Berndorff D (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 545–561. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.545 - DOI
-
- Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJzendoorn MH, & Bradley RH (2005). Those who have, receive: The Matthew effect in early childhood intervention in the home environment. Review of Educational Research, 75, 1–26. doi:10.3102/00346543075001001 - DOI
-
- Bernacki ML, & Walkington C (2018). The role of situational interest in personalized learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110, 864–881. doi:10.1037/edu0000250. A longitudinal study on effects of context personalization in high school students. - DOI
-
- Brown SI, & Walter MI (2005). The art of problem posing. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
-
- Canning EA, & Harackiewicz JM (2015). Teach it, don’t preach it: The differential effects of directly communicated and self-generated utility-value information. Motivation Science, 1, 47–71. doi:10.1037/mot0000015 Compares personalized and nonpersonalized versions of utility-value intervention. - DOI - PMC - PubMed