Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Jul;23(5):680-686.
doi: 10.1111/ner.13041. Epub 2019 Aug 29.

Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Monophasic Burst Waveform for Axial Neck and Upper Extremity Radicular Pain: A Preliminary Observational Study

Jay S Grider  1 , Michael Harned  1
Affiliations
Observational Study

Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Monophasic Burst Waveform for Axial Neck and Upper Extremity Radicular Pain: A Preliminary Observational Study

Jay S Grider et al. Neuromodulation. 2020 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Cervical spinal cord stimulation (cSCS) is an accepted therapeutic option for radicular upper extremity pain and less commonly for cervical axial pain despite less available literature in comparison with lumbar and lower extremity applications.

Methods: This preliminary observational pilot study evaluated the efficacy of cSCS using the monophasic burst pattern in the treatment of both upper extremity radicular pain and axial neck pain. Primary outcome measures were reduction in pain scores, global pain scale (GPS) indices, and neck Oswestry disability index (nODI).

Results: Of the 23 subjects trialed, 15 went to implantation of cSCS using burst and were followed for 1 year prospectively. Pre- and postprimary outcome measures suggested a statistically (p < 0.05) and clinically significant 12.40 point differential in the nODI, a statistically significant reduction of the GPS from 74.60 to 56.37 (p < 0.05), and a reduction in the pain rating score from 8.13 +/- 1.0 prior to trial to 3.85 +/- 1.1 at 1 year for axial neck and with and without radicular pain (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: This preliminary study suggests that the use of the burst waveform applied to cSCS results in improved function and decreased pain scores in subjects with axial neck pain with and without radicular symptomatology and cervicogenic headache.

Keywords: Burst waveform; cervical pain; radicular pain; spinal cord stimulation; spinal cord stimulation programming.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Grider JS, Manchikanti L, Carayannopoulos A et al. Effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation in chronic spinal pain: a systematic review. Pain Physician 2016;19:E33-E54.
    1. Provenzano DA, Amirdelfan K, Kapural L, Sitzman BT. Evidence gaps in the use of spinal cord stimulation treating spine conditions. Spine 2017;42:580-592.
    1. Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW et al. Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: 24 month results from a multicenter randomized controlled pivotal trial. Neurosurgery 2016;79:667-677.
    1. Deer T, Slavin K, Amirdelfan K et al. Success using neuromodulation with BURST (SUNBURST) study: results from a prospective, randomized controlled trial using a novel burst waveform. Neuromodulation 2018;21:56-66.
    1. Deer TR, Skaribas IM, Haider N et al. Effectiveness of cervical spinal cord stimulation for management of chronic pain. Neuromodulation 2014;17:265-271.

Publication types