Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Dec:99:106105.
doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106105. Epub 2019 Aug 21.

Piloting a clinical laboratory method to evaluate the influence of potential modified risk tobacco products on smokers' quit-related motivation, choice, and behavior

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Piloting a clinical laboratory method to evaluate the influence of potential modified risk tobacco products on smokers' quit-related motivation, choice, and behavior

Jenny E Ozga-Hess et al. Addict Behav. 2019 Dec.

Abstract

Research methods are needed that can predict whether the availability of potential modified risk tobacco products (MRTPs) may influence smokers' quit-related motivation, choice, and behavior. This pilot study assessed the primary outcomes of feasibility and adherence to address this need using an electronic cigarette (ECIG) as a model MRTP. Cigarette smokers were randomly assigned to use only their own brand of cigarettes (OB-only) or a second-generation ECIG (18 ng/ml nicotine) plus their OB cigarettes (ECIG+OB) ad libitum for four weeks. Participants logged products using a mobile device, collected used cigarette filters, and provided saliva samples every day for analysis of cotinine. They returned to the lab once per week to provide a breath sample and accept or decline a choice to quit all tobacco products (i.e., cigarettes and/or ECIGs). They also returned for a one-month follow-up visit. Of those participants randomized (n = 60), 56.7% completed the 4-week intervention and 40.0% completed the follow-up visit. The primary reason for withdrawal was poor adherence with mobile device use. Comparable numbers of participants in each group chose to make a quit attempt, although more OB-only participants chose to quit during the first two weeks and more ECIG+OB participants during the last two weeks. With protocol modifications to reduce participation burden, the current method might ultimately be used by regulators to predict how smokers' quit-related motivation, choice, and behavior are influenced by current and future MRTPs.

Keywords: Electronic cigarette (ECIG); Feasibility; Quit attempt; Quit timing; Smoker; Tobacco.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

Author SGF has consulted for various pharmaceutical companies on matters relating to smoking cessation. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Frequency of participants who moved up or down at least one stage, or who remained in the same stage, from Day 1 to Day 28 (n=34) or to follow-up (n=24) as a function of group and quit status.

References

    1. Pollay RW, Dewhirst T. The dark side of marketing seemingly “Light” cigarettes: successful images and failed fact. Tob Control. 2002;11(Suppl 1):I18–31. doi:10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i18 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haddock CK, Lando H, Klesges RC, et al. Modified tobacco use and lifestyle change in risk-reducing beliefs about smoking. Am J of Prev Med. 2004;27:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.03.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Giovino GA, Tomar SL, Reddy MN, et al. (1996). Attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs about low-yield cigarettes among adolescents and adults Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 7. The FTC Cigarette Test Method for determining Tar, Nicotine, and Carbon Monoxide Yields of U.S. Cigarettes. Report of the NCI Expert Committee. 39–57. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.
    1. Tindle HA, Shiffman S, Hartman AM, Bost JE. Switching to “lighter” cigarettes and quitting smoking. Tob Control. 2009;18:485–490. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.029314 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shiffman S, Pillitteri JL, Burton SL, Di Marino ME. Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk. Tob Control. 2004;13:78–84. doi: 10.1136/tc.2003.005272 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types