Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Sep-Oct;80(5):261-268.
doi: 10.18043/ncm.80.5.261.

Characteristics and Delivery of Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments in North Carolina

Connor Drake  1 , Julienne K Kirk  2 , John B Buse  3 , David Edelman  4 , Christopher M Shea  5 , Susan Spratt  6 , Laura A Young  7 , Anna R Kahkoska  8
Affiliations

Characteristics and Delivery of Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments in North Carolina

Connor Drake et al. N C Med J. 2019 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Successful diabetes care requires patient engagement and health self-management. Diabetes shared medical appointments (SMAs) are an evidence-based approach that enables peer support, diabetes group education, and medication management to improve outcomes. The purpose of this study is to learn how diabetes SMAs are being delivered in North Carolina, including the characteristics of diabetes SMAs across the state.METHOD Twelve health systems in the state of North Carolina were contacted to explore clinical workflow and intervention characteristics with a member of the SMA care delivery team. Surveys were used to assess intervention characteristics and delivery.RESULTS Diabetes SMAs were offered in 10 clinics in 5 of the 12 health systems contacted with considerable heterogeneity across sites. The majority of SMAs were open cohorts (80%), offered monthly (60%) for 1.5 hours (60%). SMAs included a mean of 7.5 ± 3.4 patients with a maximum of 11.2 ± 2.7 patients. Survey data revealed barriers (cost-sharing and provider buy-in) to, and facilitators (leadership support and clinical champions) of, clinical adoption and sustained implementation.LIMITATIONS External validity is limited due to the small sample size and geographic clustering.CONCLUSION There is significant heterogeneity in the delivery and characteristics of diabetes SMAs in North Carolina with only modest uptake across the health systems. Further research to determine best practices and effectiveness in diverse, real-world clinical settings is required to inform implementation and dissemination efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflicts of interest. The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.. Best Practices for Diabetes SMA Delivery and Implementation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2017. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US Department of Health and Human Services; 2017.
    1. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2018 abridged for primary care providers. Clinical Diabetes. 2018;36(1):14–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vazquez-Benitez G, Desai JR, Xu S, et al. Preventable major cardiovascular events associated with uncontrolled glucose, blood pressure, and lipids and active smoking in adults with diabetes with and without cardiovascular disease: a contemporary analysis. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(5):905–912. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Affairs. 2001;20(6):64–78. - PubMed
    1. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. The Milbank Quarterly. 1996;74(4):511–544. - PubMed