Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients
- PMID: 31474791
- PMCID: PMC6686086
- DOI: 10.20524/aog.2019.0400
Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients
Abstract
Background: Inadequate bowel preparation is still the main obstacle to a complete colonoscopy in many patients and necessitates many repeated procedures. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation and to better characterize these patients.
Methods: This was a retrospective study that reviewed electronic reports of colonoscopy procedures over a 10-year period. Patients were divided into 2 groups: adequate vs. non-adequate bowel preparation. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify variables associated with inadequate bowel preparation, including age, sex, setting (inpatient/outpatient), preparation regimen and procedures' indications. We examined the effect of inadequate preparation on colonoscopy quality indicators.
Results: Of the 28,725 patients included in the study, 6,702 (23.3%) had inadequate bowel preparation. In the multivariate analysis, advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 1.015, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.013-1.017; P<0.01), male sex (OR 1.353, 95%CI 1.286-1.423; P<0.01) and a minority population (OR 1.635, 95%CI 1.531-1.746; P<0.01) were significantly associated with inadequate bowel preparation. The inpatient setting was among the most prominent factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation (OR 2.018, 95%CI 1.884-2.163; P<0.01). Adequate bowel preparation was associated with a higher polyp detection rate (26.8% vs. 23.6%; OR 1.22, 95%CI 1.109-1.347; P<0.01) and colorectal cancer (2.8% vs. 2.4%; OR 1.402, 95%CI 1.146-1.716; P<0.01), and higher frequencies of cecal (96.4% vs. 73.5%; OR 2.243, 95%CI 2.095-2.403; P<0.01) and terminal ileum intubation (8.1% vs. 5.4%; OR 1.243, 95%CI 1.088-1.434; P<0.01).
Conclusion: We outlined various factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation and confirmed its adverse effect on colonoscopy quality indicators.
Keywords: Bowel preparation; outcomes; predictors.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: None
References
-
- Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:873–885. - PubMed
-
- Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1795–1803. - PubMed
-
- Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy:recommendations from the U.S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:543–562. - PubMed
-
- Saltzman JR, Cash BD, Pasha SF, et al. ASGE Stards of Practice Committee. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:781–794. - PubMed
-
- Manes G, Amato A, Arena M, Pallotta S, Radaelli F, Masci E. Efficacy and acceptability of sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate vs low-volume polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for colon cleansing:a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:1145–1153. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources