Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients
- PMID: 31474791
- PMCID: PMC6686086
- DOI: 10.20524/aog.2019.0400
Predictors and colonoscopy outcomes of inadequate bowel cleansing: a 10-year experience in 28,725 patients
Abstract
Background: Inadequate bowel preparation is still the main obstacle to a complete colonoscopy in many patients and necessitates many repeated procedures. We aimed to identify risk factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation and to better characterize these patients.
Methods: This was a retrospective study that reviewed electronic reports of colonoscopy procedures over a 10-year period. Patients were divided into 2 groups: adequate vs. non-adequate bowel preparation. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify variables associated with inadequate bowel preparation, including age, sex, setting (inpatient/outpatient), preparation regimen and procedures' indications. We examined the effect of inadequate preparation on colonoscopy quality indicators.
Results: Of the 28,725 patients included in the study, 6,702 (23.3%) had inadequate bowel preparation. In the multivariate analysis, advanced age (odds ratio [OR] 1.015, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.013-1.017; P<0.01), male sex (OR 1.353, 95%CI 1.286-1.423; P<0.01) and a minority population (OR 1.635, 95%CI 1.531-1.746; P<0.01) were significantly associated with inadequate bowel preparation. The inpatient setting was among the most prominent factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation (OR 2.018, 95%CI 1.884-2.163; P<0.01). Adequate bowel preparation was associated with a higher polyp detection rate (26.8% vs. 23.6%; OR 1.22, 95%CI 1.109-1.347; P<0.01) and colorectal cancer (2.8% vs. 2.4%; OR 1.402, 95%CI 1.146-1.716; P<0.01), and higher frequencies of cecal (96.4% vs. 73.5%; OR 2.243, 95%CI 2.095-2.403; P<0.01) and terminal ileum intubation (8.1% vs. 5.4%; OR 1.243, 95%CI 1.088-1.434; P<0.01).
Conclusion: We outlined various factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation and confirmed its adverse effect on colonoscopy quality indicators.
Keywords: Bowel preparation; outcomes; predictors.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: None
Similar articles
-
Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for inpatient colonoscopy.Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov;28(6):460-464. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2017.17196. Epub 2017 Oct 25. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 29086713
-
Predictors of poor bowel preparations and colonoscopy cancellations in inpatient colonoscopies, a single center retrospective study.Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jan 25;7:4. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2020.02.13. eCollection 2022. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 35243113 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of acuity level and patient characteristics on bowel preparation quality: a retrospective cohort study of inpatient colonoscopies.BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 15;23(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02751-1. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023. PMID: 37061688 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing bowel cleansing for colonoscopy.Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Apr;90(4):520-6. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.01.015. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015. PMID: 25841255 Review.
-
Patient Characteristics Associated With Quality of Colonoscopy Preparation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;16(3):357-369.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.08.016. Epub 2017 Aug 18. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 28826680
Cited by
-
Efficacy and Patient Tolerability Profiles of Probiotic Solution with Bisacodyl Versus Conventional Cleansing Solution for Bowel Preparation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 13;9(10):3286. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103286. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 33066237 Free PMC article.
-
Guidelines for accreditation of endoscopy units: quality measures from the Korean Society of Coloproctology.Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Mar;100(3):154-165. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.3.154. Epub 2021 Feb 26. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021. PMID: 33748029 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic Disease Activity and Biologic Therapy Are Independent Predictors of Suboptimal Bowel Preparation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Undergoing Colonoscopy.Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Oct;67(10):4851-4865. doi: 10.1007/s10620-022-07530-8. Epub 2022 May 27. Dig Dis Sci. 2022. PMID: 35624326
-
Clinical Characteristics and Main Findings of Colonoscopy in Tripoli Central Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study of 1858 Patients.Cureus. 2023 Feb 14;15(2):e34983. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34983. eCollection 2023 Feb. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 36938214 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical characteristics of colonoscopy in 448 patients in the Zanzibar Archipelago: a cross-sectional study.Pan Afr Med J. 2022 Apr 18;41:310. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.310.34185. eCollection 2022. Pan Afr Med J. 2022. PMID: 35855036 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:873–885. - PubMed
-
- Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1795–1803. - PubMed
-
- Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB, et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy:recommendations from the U.S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:543–562. - PubMed
-
- Saltzman JR, Cash BD, Pasha SF, et al. ASGE Stards of Practice Committee. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:781–794. - PubMed
-
- Manes G, Amato A, Arena M, Pallotta S, Radaelli F, Masci E. Efficacy and acceptability of sodium picosulphate/magnesium citrate vs low-volume polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid for colon cleansing:a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15:1145–1153. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources