Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;28(11):2119-2140.
doi: 10.1002/pon.5215. Epub 2019 Oct 15.

Self-management interventions for cancer survivors: A systematic review and evaluation of intervention content and theories

Colleen A Cuthbert  1 , Janine F Farragher  2 , Brenda R Hemmelgarn  2   3 , Qirui Ding  4 , Geoffrey P McKinnon  1 , Winson Y Cheung  1   5
Affiliations

Self-management interventions for cancer survivors: A systematic review and evaluation of intervention content and theories

Colleen A Cuthbert et al. Psychooncology. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: Self-management has been proposed as a strategy to help cancer patients optimize their health and well-being during survivorship. Previous reviews have shown variable effects of self-management on outcomes. The theoretical basis and psychoeducational components of these interventions have not been evaluated in detail. We aimed to evaluate the evidence for self-management and provide a description of the components of these interventions.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of self-management interventions for adults who had completed primary cancer treatment by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry, and Cochrane CENTRAL Registry of Controlled Trials. We included experimental and quasiexperimental designs. Data synthesis included narrative and tabular summary of results; heterogeneity of interventions and outcomes precluded meta-analysis. Study quality was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool or the risk of bias of nonrandomized studies tool.

Results: Forty-one studies published between 1994 and 29 March 2018 were included. Studies were predominantly randomized controlled trials and targeted to breast cancer survivors. A variety of intervention designs, psychoeducational components, and outcomes were identified. Less than 50% of the studies included a theoretical framework. There was variability of effects across most outcomes. Risk of bias could not be fully assessed.

Conclusions: There are limitations in the design and research on self-management interventions for cancer survivors that hinder their translation into clinical practice. Further research is needed to understand if these interventions are an important type of support for cancer survivors.

Keywords: cancer survivors; psychoeducational interventions; self-management; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

REFERENCES

    1. Stewart BW, Wild CP (eds). World cancer report 2014. International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization. www.publications.iarc. .
    1. Bray R, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Toerre LA, Jemal A. Global Cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 0: 1-31. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492, 68, 6.
    1. Elliot J, Fallows A, Staetsky L, et al. The health and well-being of cancer survivors in the UK: results from a population-based survey. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(S1):S11-S20. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.418
    1. Khan NF, Mant D, Carpenter L, Froman D, Rose PW. Long-term health outcomes in a British cohort of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer survivors: a database study. Br J Cancer. 2011;105(Supp 1):S29-S37.
    1. Fossa SD, Vassilopoulou-Sellin R, Dahl AA. Long term physical sequelae after adult onset cancer. J Cancer Surviv. 2008;2(1):3-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-007-0039-5

Publication types