Compatibility of early natural enemy introductions in commercial pepper and tomato greenhouses with repeated pesticide applications
- PMID: 31475776
- PMCID: PMC7496849
- DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12723
Compatibility of early natural enemy introductions in commercial pepper and tomato greenhouses with repeated pesticide applications
Abstract
Successful integrated pest management in protected crops implies an evaluation of the compatibility of pesticides and natural enemies (NE), as control strategies that only rely on one tactic can fail when pest populations exceed NE activity or pests become resistant to pesticides. Nowadays in Almería (Spain), growers release NE prior to transplanting or early in the crop cycle to favor their settlement before pest arrival because this improves biocontrol efficacy, although it extends pesticide exposure periods. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the compatibility of two applications of pesticides with key NE in 2-year trials inside tomato and sweet pepper commercial greenhouses: Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Hemiptera: Miridae), Orius laevigatus (Say) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) and Amblyseius swirskii (Athias-Henriot) (Acari: Phytoseiidae). In tomato, flubendiamide and chlorantraniliprole (IOBC category 1) were compatible with N. tenuis, but chlorpyrifos-methyl and spinosad (IOBC categories 2-3), which effectively reduced Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) density, compromised its predatory activity. In sweet pepper, chlorantraniliprole (IOBC category 1) was the only pesticide compatible with O. laevigatus while chlorantraniliprole, emamectin benzoate, spirotetramat and pymetrozine were harmless (IOBC category 1) to Amblyseius swirskii, and sulfoxaflor slightly harmful (IOBC category 2) to this phytoseiid predator.
Keywords: Amblyseius swirskii; Nesidiocoris tenuis; Orius laevigatus; Tuta absoluta; chemical control; Frankliniella occidentalis.
© 2019 The Authors. Insect Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.
Figures

References
-
- Abraham, C.M. , Braman, S.K. , Oetting, R.D. and Hinkle, N.C. (2013) Pesticide compatibility with natural enemies for pest management in greenhouse gerbera daisies. Journal of Economic Entomology, 106, 1590–1601. - PubMed
-
- Amor, F. , Medina, P. , Bengochea, P. , Cánovas, M. , Vega, P. , Correia, R. et al (2012) Effect of emamectin benzoate under semi‐field and field conditions on key predatory biological control agents used in vegetable greenhouse. Biocontrol Science & Technology, 22, 219–232.
-
- Armer, C.A. , Wiedenmann, R.N. and Bush, D.R. (1998) Plant feeding site selection on soybean by the facultatively phytophagous predator Orius insidiosus . Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 86, 109–118.
-
- Arnó, J. and Gabarra, R. (2011) Side effects of selected insecticides on the Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) predators Macrolophus pygmaeus and Nesidiocoris tenuis (Hemiptera: Miridae). Journal of Pest Science, 84, 513–520.
-
- Bakker, F.M. and Jacas, J.A. (1995) Pesticides and phytoseiid mites: strategies for risk assessment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 32, 58–67. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources