Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks
- PMID: 31476612
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104032
Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks
Abstract
Visual search tasks play a key role in theories of visual attention. But single-target search tasks may provide only a snapshot of attentional orienting. Foraging tasks with multiple targets of different types arguably provide a closer analogy to everyday attentional processing. Set-size effects have in the literature formed the basis for inferring how attention operates during visual search. We therefore measured the effects of absolute set-size (constant target-distractor ratio) and relative set-size (constant set-size but target-distractor ratio varies) on foraging patterns during "feature" foraging (targets differed from distractors on a single feature) and "conjunction" foraging (targets differed from distractors on a combination of two features). Patterns of runs of same target-type selection were similar regardless of whether absolute or relative set-size varied: long sequential runs during conjunction foraging but rapid switching between target types during feature foraging. But although foraging strategies differed between feature and conjunction foraging, surprisingly, intertarget times throughout foraging trials did not differ much between the conditions. Typical response time by set-size patterns for single-target visual search tasks were only observed for the last target during foraging. Furthermore, the foraging patterns within trials involved several distinct phases, that may serve as markers of particular attentional operations. Foraging tasks provide a remarkably intricate picture of attentional selection, far more detailed than traditional single-target visual search tasks, and well-known theories of visual attention have difficulty accounting for key aspects of the observed foraging patterns. Finally, we discuss how theoretical conceptions of attention could be modified to account for these effects.
Keywords: Set-size effects; Visual attention; Visual foraging; Visual search.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 May;44(5):707-721. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000467. Epub 2018 Apr 2. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018. PMID: 29608077
-
Target selection during "snapshot" foraging.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Nov;86(8):2778-2793. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02988-2. Epub 2024 Nov 27. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024. PMID: 39604757
-
Hybrid foraging search: Searching for multiple instances of multiple types of target.Vision Res. 2016 Feb;119:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 20. Vision Res. 2016. PMID: 26731644 Free PMC article.
-
Foraging behavior in visual search: A review of theoretical and mathematical models in humans and animals.Psychol Res. 2022 Mar;86(2):331-349. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01499-1. Epub 2021 Mar 21. Psychol Res. 2022. PMID: 33745028 Review.
-
Individual differences in visual search: A systematic review of the link between visual search performance and traits or abilities.Cortex. 2024 Sep;178:51-90. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.05.020. Epub 2024 Jun 20. Cortex. 2024. PMID: 38970898
Cited by
-
Research on re-searching: interrupted foraging is not disrupted foraging.Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 May 15;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00556-8. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024. PMID: 38748189 Free PMC article.
-
Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1060-1092. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9. Epub 2021 Feb 5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021. PMID: 33547630 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding human visual foraging: a review.Biol Cybern. 2025 Jul 23;119(4-6):20. doi: 10.1007/s00422-025-01020-6. Biol Cybern. 2025. PMID: 40699383 Review.
-
Eating disorder symptoms and foraging for food related items.J Eat Disord. 2021 Feb 10;9(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00373-0. J Eat Disord. 2021. PMID: 33568221 Free PMC article.
-
The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging?Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 May 6;6(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00299-w. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021. PMID: 33956238 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources