Experiences of pregnant women with a third trimester routine ultrasound - a qualitative study
- PMID: 31477046
- PMCID: PMC6720093
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2470-9
Experiences of pregnant women with a third trimester routine ultrasound - a qualitative study
Abstract
Background: Studies showed that pregnant women generally value routine ultrasounds in the first two trimesters because these provide reassurance and a chance to see their unborn baby. This, in turn, might help to decrease maternal anxiety levels and increase the bond with the baby. However, it is unclear whether pregnant women hold the same positive views about a third trimester routine ultrasound, which is increasingly being used in the Netherlands as a screening tool to monitor fetal growth. The aim of this study was to explore pregnant women's experiences with a third trimester routine ultrasound.
Methods: We held semi-structured interviews with fifteen low-risk pregnant women who received a third trimester routine ultrasound in the context of the Dutch IUGR RIsk Selection (IRIS) study. The IRIS study is a nationwide cluster randomized controlled trial carried out among more than 13,000 women to examine the effectiveness of a third trimester routine ultrasound to monitor fetal growth. For the interviews, participants were purposively selected based on parity, age, ethnicity, and educational level. We performed thematic content analysis using MAXQDA.
Results: Most pregnant women appreciated a third trimester routine ultrasound because it provided them confirmation that their baby was fine and an extra opportunity to see their baby. At the same time they expressed that they already felt confident about the health of their baby, and did not feel that their bond with their baby had increased after the third trimester ultrasound. Women also reported that they were getting used to routine ultrasounds throughout their pregnancy, and that this increased their need for another one.
Conclusions: Pregnant women seem to appreciate a third trimester routine ultrasound, but it does not seem to reduce anxiety or to improve bonding with their baby. Women's appreciation of a third trimester routine ultrasound might arise from getting used to routine ultrasounds throughout pregnancy. We recommend to examine the psychological impact of third trimester routine ultrasounds in future studies. Results should be taken into consideration when balancing the gains, which are as yet not clear, of introducing a third trimester routine ultrasound against unwanted side effects and costs.
Keywords: Maternal bonding; Pregnancy; Pregnancy anxiety; Primary care; Qualitative studies; Ultrasound.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
The effect of offering a third-trimester routine ultrasound on pregnancy-specific anxiety and mother-to-infant bonding in low-risk women: A pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial.Birth. 2022 Mar;49(1):61-70. doi: 10.1111/birt.12573. Epub 2021 Jul 20. Birth. 2022. PMID: 34288070 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth restriction: study protocol of a nationwide stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial in The Netherlands (The IRIS Study).BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1104-8. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 27737654 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Does fetal screening affect women's worries about the health of their baby? A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound screening for Down's syndrome versus routine ultrasound screening.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004 Jul;83(7):634-40. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00462.x. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004. PMID: 15225187 Clinical Trial.
-
Three-dimensional ultrasound and maternal bonding, a third trimester study and a review.Prenat Diagn. 2013 Jan;33(1):81-8. doi: 10.1002/pd.4013. Epub 2012 Nov 20. Prenat Diagn. 2013. PMID: 23169046 Review.
-
Routine Ultrasound in Pregnancy [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2008 Jun. Report from Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC) No. 11-2008. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2008 Jun. Report from Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC) No. 11-2008. PMID: 29320033 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Perceived Value of Prenatal Ultrasound Screening: A Survey of Pregnant Women.Matern Child Health J. 2023 Jan;27(1):101-110. doi: 10.1007/s10995-022-03515-1. Epub 2022 Nov 9. Matern Child Health J. 2023. PMID: 36352278 Free PMC article.
-
The DELIVER study; the impact of research capacity building on research, education, and practice in Dutch midwifery.PLoS One. 2023 Oct 31;18(10):e0287834. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287834. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37906553 Free PMC article.
-
Exploring measurement tools used to assess knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of pregnant women toward prenatal screening: A systematic review.Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241273557. doi: 10.1177/17455057241273557. Womens Health (Lond). 2024. PMID: 39206551 Free PMC article.
-
Antenatal Doppler ultrasound implementation in a rural sub-Saharan African setting: exploring the perspectives of women and healthcare providers.Reprod Health. 2021 Oct 7;18(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01233-5. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 34620186 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of antenatal imaging on prenatal bonding in uncomplicated pregnancies: a mixed methods analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 11;24(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06469-0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 38605314 Free PMC article.
References
-
- EUROCAT. EUROCAT Special Report . Prenatal Screening Policies in Europe 2010. EUROCAT Central Registry, University of Ulster. 2010.
-
- Gitsels-van der Wal J, Verhoeven PS, Mannien J, Martin L, Reinders HS, Spelten E, et al. Factors affecting the uptake of prenatal screening tests for congenital anomalies; a multicentre prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14(1):264. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-264. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ward P. Down’s syndrome screening in England. London: NHS Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme. Committe UNS; 2011.