Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2019 Sep 2;19(1):322.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2472-7.

Gestational weight gain outside the Institute of Medicine recommendations and adverse pregnancy outcomes: analysis using individual participant data from randomised trials

Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Gestational weight gain outside the Institute of Medicine recommendations and adverse pregnancy outcomes: analysis using individual participant data from randomised trials

Ewelina Rogozińska et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: High Body Mass Index (BMI) and gestational weight gain (GWG) affect an increasing number of pregnancies. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has issued recommendations on the optimal GWG for women according to their pre-pregnancy BMI (healthy, overweight or obese). It has been shown that pregnant women rarely met the recommendations; however, it is unclear by how much. Previous studies also adjusted the analyses for various women's characteristics making their comparison challenging.

Methods: We analysed individual participant data (IPD) of healthy women with a singleton pregnancy and a BMI of 18.5 kg/m2 or more from the control arms of 36 randomised trials (16 countries). Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to describe the association between GWG outside (above or below) the IOM recommendations (2009) and risks of caesarean section, preterm birth, and large or small for gestational age (LGA or SGA) infants. The association was examined overall, within the BMI categories and by quartile of GWG departure from the IOM recommendations. We obtained aOR using mixed-effects logistic regression, accounting for the within-study clustering and a priori identified characteristics.

Results: Out of 4429 women (from 33 trials) meeting the inclusion criteria, two thirds gained weight outside the IOM recommendations (1646 above; 1291 below). The median GWG outside the IOM recommendations was 3.1 kg above and 2.7 kg below. In comparison to GWG within the IOM recommendations, GWG above was associated with increased odds of caesarean section (aOR 1.50; 95%CI 1.25, 1.80), LGA (2.00; 1.58, 2.54), and reduced odds of SGA (0.66; 0.50, 0.87); no significant effect on preterm birth was detected. The relationship between GWG below the IOM recommendation and caesarean section or LGA was inconclusive; however, the odds of preterm birth (1.94; 1.31, 2.28) and SGA (1.52; 1.18, 1.96) were increased.

Conclusions: Consistently with previous findings, adherence to the IOM recommendations seem to help achieve better pregnancy outcomes. Nevertheless, even in the context of clinical trials, women find it difficult to adhere to them. Further research should focus on identifying ways of achieving a healthier GWG as defined by the IOM recommendations.

Keywords: Body mass index; Gestational weight gain; Individual participant data; Institute of Medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

FGS is a member of the editorial board (Associate Editor) of BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of kilograms of gestational weight gain outside the Institute of Medicine recommendations (2009)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Quartiles of gestational weight gain outside the Institute of Medicine recommendations (2009) and pregnancy complications

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Institute of Medicine . Weight gain during pregnancy - reexamining the guidelines. In: Rasmussen KM, Yaktine AL, editors. Technical Guidelines. Washington (DC): Institute of Medicine and National Research Council, The National Academies Press; 2009. - PubMed
    1. Cedergren MI. Optimal gestational weight gain for body mass index categories. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:759–764. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000279450.85198.b2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferraro ZM, Contador F, Tawfiq A, Adamo KB, Gaudet L. Gestational weight gain and medical outcomes of pregnancy. Obstet Med. 2015;8(3):133–137. doi: 10.1177/1753495X15591320. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeVader SR, Neeley HL, Myles TD, Leet TL. Evaluation of gestational weight gain guidelines for women with normal prepregnancy body mass index. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(4):745–751. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000284451.37882.85. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Margerison Zilko CE, Rehkopf D, Abrams B. Association of maternal gestational weight gain with short- and long-term maternal and child health outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(6):574 e1–574 e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.12.007. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms