Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 16;4(Suppl 8):e001483.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001483. eCollection 2019.

Primary care financing: a systematic assessment of research priorities in low- and middle-income countries

Affiliations

Primary care financing: a systematic assessment of research priorities in low- and middle-income countries

Felicity Goodyear-Smith et al. BMJ Glob Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Financing of primary healthcare (PHC) is the key to the provision of equitable universal care. We aimed to identify and prioritise the perceived needs of PHC practitioners and researchers for new research in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) about financing of PHC.

Methods: Three-round expert panel consultation using web-based surveys of LMIC PHC practitioners, academics and policy-makers sampled from global networks. Iterative literature review conducted in parallel. First round (Pre-Delphi survey) elicited possible research questions to address knowledge gaps about financing. Responses were independently coded, collapsed and synthesised to two lists of questions. Round 2 (Delphi Round 1) invited panellists to rate importance of each question. In Round 3 (Delphi Round 2), panellists ranked questions in order of importance.

Results: A diverse range of PHC practitioners, academics and policy-makers in LMIC representing all global regions identified 479 knowledge gaps as potentially critical to improving PHC financing. Round 2 provided 31 synthesised questions on financing for rating. The top 16 were ranked in Round 3e to produce four prioritised research questions.

Conclusions: This novel exercise created an expansive and prioritised list of critical knowledge gaps in PHC financing research questions. This offers valuable guidance to global supporters of primary care evaluation and implementation, including research funders and academics seeking research priorities. The source and context specificity of this research, informed by LMIC practitioners and academics on a global and local basis, should increase the likelihood of local relevance and eventual success in implementing the findings.

Keywords: delphi; developing countries; economics; financing healthcare: low-income and middlie-income; knowledge; organisation and administration; primary healthcare; research gaps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of literature reviews. LMIC, low- and middle-income country.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of studies from each LMIC. LMIC, low- and middle-income country.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Static copy of gap map. PHC, primary healthcare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. International Conference on Primary Health Care Declaration of Alma-Ata. Alma-Ata, USSR: WHO, 1978.
    1. Commonwealth Fund Primary care: our first line of defense. New York: Commonwealth Fund, 2013.
    1. European Forum for Primary Care EFPC at a glance, 2017. Available: http://www.euprimarycare.org/about/efpc-glance
    1. Goodwin N, Dixon A, Poole T, et al. Improving the quality of care in general practice Report of an independent inquiry commissioned by The King’s Fund. London: The King's fund, 2011.
    1. Starfield B. Measuring the attainment of primary care. Academic Medicine 1979;54:361–9. 10.1097/00001888-197905000-00001 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources