Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2019 Oct;34(10):1723-1729.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03370-7. Epub 2019 Sep 2.

Additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal cancer: a review of 53 cases

Affiliations
Review

Additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal cancer: a review of 53 cases

Shinichiro Makimoto et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows the en bloc resection of tumors and is particularly indicated for T1 colorectal cancer. The number of patients undergoing additional surgery after colorectal ESD is increasing. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and long-term outcomes in patients with additional surgery.

Methods: Of 1018 patients who underwent colorectal ESD in our hospital between February 2010 and July 2018, 53 patients who underwent additional surgery in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed and investigated for their clinicopathological characteristics. The need for additional surgery was determined by a pathological examination according to the guideline [1].

Results: In total, 53 patients (24 men, 29 women; mean age, 68.2 years; mean tumor diameter, 30.5 mm) were included. Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 47 (88.7%) patients. Liver metastases were preoperatively observed in one patient, for whom hepatectomy was simultaneously performed. All procedures included pathological R0 resection. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 (17.0%) patients. There were no complications requiring reoperation. Fifteen (28.3%) patients had a positive vertical margin; of these patients, residual tumor was observed in the resected specimens of two (13.3%) patients. Eight patients (15.1%) had lymph node metastasis (LNM): four (25.0%) and four (10.8%) of 16 and 37 patients with and without vascular invasion, respectively. Eleven patients (20.8%) had grade 2 or 3 tumor budding, and four (36.4%) of these had LNM. Postoperative recurrence was observed in two (3.8%) patients.

Conclusion: Additional surgery after ESD for T1 colorectal cancer was effective and had good long-term outcomes.

Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Lymph node metastasis; Submucosal colorectal carcinoma; Tumor budding; Vascular invasion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jun;34(3):334-40 - PubMed
    1. J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;39(6):534-43 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jan;48(1):92-100 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991 Apr;34(4):323-8 - PubMed
    1. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Nov;103(11):2700-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources