Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL): Development of a Profile Instrument (CIQOL-35 Profile) and a Global Measure (CIQOL-10 Global)
- PMID: 31479616
- PMCID: PMC6808347
- DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-19-0142
Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL): Development of a Profile Instrument (CIQOL-35 Profile) and a Global Measure (CIQOL-10 Global)
Abstract
Purpose Valid, reliable, and efficient patient-reported outcome measures are needed to quantify quality of life (QOL) outcomes after cochlear implantation to supplement information obtained from performance-based outcomes. We previously developed the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) item bank to serve as the source of items for subsequent instruments. This study reports the development and psychometric properties for 2 of these new instruments, the CIQOL-35 Profile and the CIQOL-10 Global. Method Cochlear implant (CI) users referred from the CIQOL Development Consortium (n = 371), consisting of 20 CI centers across the United States, provided responses to the 81-item CIQOL item bank, which are grouped into 6 QOL domains (communication, emotional, entertainment, environment, listening effort, and social). Responses to the 81 CIQOL items were analyzed using item response theory to determine individual item difficulty, discrimination, and model fit to select the set of items for the profile instrument and global measure that would optimize their measurement characteristics. Results The 35-item CIQOL-35 Profile instrument assesses outcomes represented in the 6 domains of the CIQOL final item pool. The 10-item CIQOL-10 Global measure produces a single, overall QOL score. After ensuring the upper and lower ends of the item difficulty continuum were represented (item difficulty range: -2.48 to 2.47), the items with the highest discrimination ability for each domain were selected for the CIQOL-35 Profile instrument (discrimination range: 0.67-1.37). Items were selected for the CIQOL-10 Global measure in a similar manner. Conclusion The CIQOL-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments provide psychometrically sound and efficient measures that can be used to assess QOL in adult CI users in both clinical and research settings. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.9745010.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Development and Implementation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Functional Staging System.Laryngoscope. 2022 Nov;132 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S1-S13. doi: 10.1002/lary.30381. Epub 2022 Sep 9. Laryngoscope. 2022. PMID: 36082873 Free PMC article.
-
Validity and reliability of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-10 Global instruments in comparison to legacy instruments.Ear Hear. 2021 July/Aug;42(4):896-908. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001022. Ear Hear. 2021. PMID: 33735907 Free PMC article.
-
Development of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life Item Bank.Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):1016-1024. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000684. Ear Hear. 2019. PMID: 30531259 Free PMC article.
-
Item banking: a generational change in patient-reported outcome measurement.Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Apr;87(4):285-93. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181d408d7. Optom Vis Sci. 2010. PMID: 20142792 Review.
-
Recommendations on the use of item libraries for patient-reported outcome measurement in oncology trials: findings from an international, multidisciplinary working group.Lancet Oncol. 2023 Feb;24(2):e86-e95. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00654-4. Lancet Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36725153 Review.
Cited by
-
Development and Implementation of the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) Functional Staging System.Laryngoscope. 2022 Nov;132 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S1-S13. doi: 10.1002/lary.30381. Epub 2022 Sep 9. Laryngoscope. 2022. PMID: 36082873 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of Cochlear Implant Satisfaction and Decisional Regret in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.Otol Neurotol. 2023 Dec 1;44(10):e722-e729. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004028. Epub 2023 Oct 19. Otol Neurotol. 2023. PMID: 37853774 Free PMC article.
-
A scoping review of Rasch analysis and item response theory in otolaryngology: Implications and future possibilities.Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Jan 6;9(1):e1208. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1208. eCollection 2024 Feb. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 38362194 Free PMC article.
-
American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force: Recommendations for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Adults.Laryngoscope. 2024 Feb;134 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S1-S14. doi: 10.1002/lary.30879. Epub 2023 Jul 12. Laryngoscope. 2024. PMID: 37435829 Free PMC article.
-
Social Outcomes Among Adults With Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Aug 1;151(8):806-816. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2025.1777. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025. PMID: 40608327
References
-
- Adunka O. F., Gantz B. J., Dunn C., Gurgel R. K., & Buchman C. A. (2018). Minimum reporting standards for adult cochlear implantation. Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, 159(2), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599818764329 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Boone W. J. (2016). Rasch analysis for instrument development: Why, when, and how? CBE Life Science Education, 15(4). pii: rm4. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-04-0148 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Brown T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
-
- Capretta N. R., & Moberly A. C. (2016). Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users? Laryngoscope, 126(3), 699–706. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25525 - PubMed
-
- Cox R. M., & Alexander G. C. (1995). The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit. Ear and Hearing, 16(2), 176–186. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical