Assessment of hospital characteristics associated with improved mortality following complex upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery in Queensland
- PMID: 31480100
- DOI: 10.1111/ans.15389
Assessment of hospital characteristics associated with improved mortality following complex upper gastrointestinal cancer surgery in Queensland
Abstract
Background: High hospital-volume and service capability are associated with improved mortality following complex cancer surgery. Using a population-based study in Queensland, we assessed differences in mortality following oesophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy, comparing high- and low-volume hospitals stratified by service capability.
Methods: Data on all patients undergoing oesophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer in Queensland between 2001 and 2015 were obtained from the Queensland Oncology Repository. Hospital service capability was defined using the 2015 Australian Institute of Health and Welfare hospital peer groupings. Hospitals were grouped into 'high-volume (≥6 oesophagectomies or pancreaticoduodenectomies annually) with high service capability'; 'low-volume (<6) with high service capability' and 'low-volume with low service capability'. Multivariate Poisson models were used to estimate differences in 30- and 90-day mortality between hospital groups adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status, Charlson and American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, stage and time-period.
Results: For oesophagectomy, adjusted 90-day mortality was higher in low-volume compared with high-volume hospitals, regardless of service capability (low-volume, high service: incident rate ratio (IRR) 3.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.74-8.57; low-volume, low service: IRR 3.40, 95% CI 1.16-10.00). For pancreaticoduodenectomy, mortality was higher in low-volume compared with high-volume centres regardless of service capability: 30-day mortality (low-volume, high service: IRR 2.32, 95% CI 1.07-5.03; low-volume, low service: IRR 3.92, 95% CI 1.45-10.61); 90-day mortality (low-volume, high service: IRR 2.36, 95% CI 1.29-4.30; low-volume, low service: IRR 3.32, 95% CI 1.64-6.71).
Conclusion: High hospital resection volumes are associated with lower post-operative mortality following oesophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy regardless of hospital service capability. This data supports centralization of these procedures to high-volume centres.
Keywords: high-volume hospitals; hospital mortality; low-volume hospitals; oesophagectomy; pancreaticoduodenectomy.
© 2019 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.
Similar articles
-
Impact of hospital resection volume and service capability on post-operative mortality following gastrectomy.ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jan;90(1-2):86-91. doi: 10.1111/ans.15616. Epub 2019 Dec 16. ANZ J Surg. 2020. PMID: 31840395
-
Impact of hospital volume on risk-adjusted mortality following oesophagectomy in Japan.Br J Surg. 2016 Dec;103(13):1880-1886. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10307. Epub 2016 Sep 29. Br J Surg. 2016. PMID: 27683023
-
Impact of hospital volume on hospital mortality, length of stay and total costs after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Br J Surg. 2014 Apr;101(5):523-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9420. Epub 2014 Feb 24. Br J Surg. 2014. PMID: 24615349
-
Hospital volume-mortality association after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):3021-3029. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001185. Int J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38353697 Free PMC article.
-
Centralization of Pancreatic Surgery in Europe.J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Oct;23(10):2081-2092. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04215-y. Epub 2019 Apr 29. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019. PMID: 31037503 Review.
Cited by
-
Textbook Outcomes for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection: A Multi-Centre Review.Curr Oncol. 2025 Jun 19;32(6):364. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32060364. Curr Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40558307 Free PMC article.
-
Essential Updates 2018/2019: Essential Updates for esophageal cancer surgery.Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Feb 18;4(3):190-194. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12319. eCollection 2020 May. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020. PMID: 32490332 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Ervik M, Ferlay J, Mery L, Soerjomataram I, Bray F. Cancer Today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2016. [Cited 30 Jun 2019.] Available from URL: http://gco.iarc.fr/today
-
- Law S. Esophagectomy without mortality: what can surgeons do? J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2010; 14(Suppl. 1): S101-7.
-
- Stavrou EP, Smith GS, Baker DF. Surgical outcomes associated with oesophagectomy in New South Wales: an investigation of hospital volume. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2010; 14: 951-7.
-
- Smith RC, Creighton N, Lord RV et al. Survival, mortality and morbidity outcomes after oesophagogastric cancer surgery in New South Wales, 2001-2008. Med. J. Aust. 2014; 200: 408-13.
-
- Markar S, Gronnier C, Duhamel A et al. Pattern of postoperative mortality after esophageal cancer resection according to center volume: results from a large European multicenter study. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2015; 22: 2615-23.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical