Performance evaluation of flow field-flow fractionation and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry for size characterization of gold nanoparticles
- PMID: 31481294
- DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460493
Performance evaluation of flow field-flow fractionation and electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry for size characterization of gold nanoparticles
Abstract
Flow field-flow fractionation (Fl-FFF) coupled off-line with electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS) was applied for particle size characterization of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs). Effects of carrier liquid and membranes on the Fl-FFF separation performance were studied in order to achieve the best separation condition for AuNPs before ETAAS analysis. The separation of AuNPs was investigated with the use of 10 kDa regenerated cellulose (RC) and 10 kDa polyethersulfone (PES) membrane and three types of carrier solution including deionized water (DI water), 0.05% SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate), and 0.02% FL-70 with 0.02% NaN3. Using DI water with 10 kDa RC membrane provided the best separation performance for AuNPs. Fractions eluted from Fl-FFF were collected and introduced into ETAAS for gold detection. With ETAAS, the time at the maximum absorbance increased when the particle size increased. The in-house synthesized AuNPs were characterized by using Fl-FFF with ETAAS, dynamic light scattering (DLS), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) technique and the results obtained were in good agreement. Statistical comparison between Fl-FFF and DLS (texperiment = 1.02), ETAAS after Fl-FFF and TEM (texperiment = 0.96) showed no significant difference using paired t-test with the critical value of t as 4.30 (P = 0.05). The experimental results indicated that the size of AuNPs from two methods, Fl-FFF with DLS for hydrodynamic diameter and ETAAS with TEM for core size, were not significantly different at P = 0.05.
Keywords: Carrier liquid; Core size; Electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry; Flow field-flow fractionation; Gold nanoparticles; Hydrodynamic diameter.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Flow field-flow fractionation with off-line electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry for size characterization of silver nanoparticles.J Chromatogr A. 2011 Jul 8;1218(27):4213-8. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.12.040. Epub 2010 Dec 21. J Chromatogr A. 2011. PMID: 21236433
-
Use of electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry for size profiling of gold and silver nanoparticles.Anal Chim Acta. 2018 Feb 13;1000:75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.09.032. Epub 2017 Sep 28. Anal Chim Acta. 2018. PMID: 29289326
-
Flow field-flow fractionation for hydrodynamic diameter estimation of gold nanoparticles with various types of surface coatings.Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018 Oct;410(26):6845-6859. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-1284-3. Epub 2018 Aug 2. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018. PMID: 30073516
-
Asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation technique for separation and characterization of biopolymers and bioparticles.J Chromatogr A. 2011 Jul 8;1218(27):4104-16. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.12.110. Epub 2011 Jan 18. J Chromatogr A. 2011. PMID: 21292269 Review.
-
Fractionation of prion protein aggregates by asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation.Methods Enzymol. 2006;412:21-33. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)12002-9. Methods Enzymol. 2006. PMID: 17046649 Review.
Cited by
-
Determination and Characterization of Gold Nanoparticles in Liquor Using Asymmetric Flow Field-Flow Fractionation Hyphenated with Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry.Molecules. 2024 Jan 3;29(1):248. doi: 10.3390/molecules29010248. Molecules. 2024. PMID: 38202831 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources