Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Aug 16:7:564.
doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00564. eCollection 2019.

Pushing the Ligand Efficiency Metrics: Relative Group Contribution (RGC) Model as a Helpful Strategy to Promote a Fragment "Rescue" Effect

Affiliations

Pushing the Ligand Efficiency Metrics: Relative Group Contribution (RGC) Model as a Helpful Strategy to Promote a Fragment "Rescue" Effect

Andrés Felipe Vásquez et al. Front Chem. .

Abstract

The ligand efficiency (LE) indexes have long been used as decision-making criteria in drug discovery and development. However, in the context of fragment-based drug design (FBDD), these metrics often exhibit a strong emphasis toward the selection of highly efficient "core" fragments for potential optimization, which are not usually considered as parts of a larger molecule with a size typical for a drug. In this study, we present a relative group contribution (RGC) model intended to predict the efficiency of a drug-sized compound in terms of its component fragments. This model could be useful not only in rapidly predicting all the possible combinations of promising fragments from an earlier hit discovery stage, but also in enabling a relatively low-LE fragment to become part of a drug-sized compound as long as it is "rescued" by other high-LE fragments.

Keywords: drug discovery; fragment library; fragment-based screening; ligand efficiency metrics; property-based design; protein-ligand interactions; structure-activity relationship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Application of RGC model to a hypothetical fragment-based drug design (FBDD) campaign. (Upper) In the “standard” or classical screening approach, a fragment is selected (i.e., can be part of a final drug-size compound) depending exclusively upon their own LE. If this parameter is not equal or greater than a pre-established cut-off value, the fragment is rejected. (Lower) According to the RGC model, a fragment is selected depending on the fragments on the other positions. Based on the presence of high-LE fragments in alternative positions (illustrated by yellow boxes), a low-LE fragment may become either rescued or rapidly discarded (using the dynamic LEδ value in both cases).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preliminary comparison between LETapp and LET for a set of 16 drug-sized literature compounds developed during FBDD studies. All compounds were elaborated using a linking strategy (on two fragments) for 10 different protein targets [formula image/formula imageLDHA formula imageReplication Protein A (RPA) formula image/formula imageBlood coagulation factor Xa formula imageBcl-2 formula imageDOT1L formula imageHsp90 formula image/formula imagePantothenate synthetase (PtS) formula imageBlood coagulation factor XIa formula imageCK2 formula imageBACE1 formula imageEndothiapepsin (Epn) formula imageBcl-xL formula imagePKM2].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albert J. S., Blomberg N., Breeze A., Brown A., Burrows J., Edwards P., et al. . (2007). An integrated approach to fragment-based lead generation: philosophy, strategy and case studies from AstraZeneca's Drug Discovery Programmes. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 7, 1600–1629. 10.2174/156802607782341091 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bembenek S. D., Tounge B. A., Reynolds C. H. (2009). Ligand efficiency and fragment-based drug discovery. Drug Discov. Today 14, 278–283. 10.1016/j.drudis.2008.11.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cavalluzzi M. M., Mangiatordi G. F., Nicolotti O., Lentini G. (2017). Ligand efficiency metrics in drug discovery: the pros and cons from a practical perspective. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 12, 1087–1104. 10.1080/17460441.2017.1365056 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cherry M., Mitchell T. (2008). Introduction to fragment-based drug discovery, in Fragment-Based Drug Discovery, eds Zartler E. R., Shapiro M. J. 1–32. 10.1002/9780470721551.ch1 - DOI
    1. Costantino L., Barlocco D. (2018). Designing Approaches to Multitarget Drugs, in Drug Selectivity: An Evolving Concept in Medicinal Chemistry, 161–205.

LinkOut - more resources