Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan;33(1):76-88.
doi: 10.1111/tri.13506. Epub 2019 Oct 7.

Donation after circulatory death today: an updated overview of the European landscape

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article
Review

Donation after circulatory death today: an updated overview of the European landscape

Mar Lomero et al. Transpl Int. 2020 Jan.
Free article

Abstract

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has become an accepted practice in many countries and remains a focus of intense interest in the transplant community. The present study is aimed at providing a description of the current situation of DCD in European countries. Specific questionnaires were developed to compile information on DCD practices, activities and post-transplant outcomes. Thirty-five countries completed the survey. DCD is practiced in 18 countries: eight have both controlled DCD (cDCD) and uncontrolled DCD (uDCD) programs, 4 only cDCD and 6 only uDCD. All these countries have legally binding and/or nonbinding texts to regulate the practice of DCD. The no-touch period ranges from 5 to 30 min. There are variations in ante and post mortem interventions used for the practice of cDCD. During 2008-2016, the highest DCD activity was described in the United Kingdom, Spain, Russia, the Netherlands, Belgium and France. Data on post-transplant outcomes of patients who receive DCD donor kidneys show better results with grafts obtained from cDCD versus uDCD donors. In conclusion, DCD is becoming increasingly accepted and performed in Europe, importantly contributing to the number of organs available and providing acceptable post-transplantation outcomes.

Keywords: brain death; donation after circulatory death; normothermic regional perfusion; organ donation; transplantation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Organ Donation and Transplantation Activities. 2016 Report. http://www.transplant-observatory.org/download/2016-activity-data-report/. Accessed March 2019.
    1. Thuong M, Ruiz A, Evrard P, et al. New classification of donation after circulatory death donors definitions and terminology. Transpl Int 2016; 29: 749.
    1. Smith M, Dominguez-Gil B, Greer DM, Manara AR, Souter MJ. Organ donation after circulatory death: current status and future potential. Intensive Care Med 2019; 45: 310.
    1. Dominguez-Gil B, Haase-Kromwijk B, Van Leiden H, et al. Current situation of donation after circulatory death in European countries. Transpl Int 2011; 24: 676.
    1. Weiss J, Elmer A, Mahíllo B, et al. Evolution of deceased organ donation activity versus efficiency over a 15-year period: an international comparison. Transplantation 2018; 102: 1768.

LinkOut - more resources