Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2017 Aug 4;2017(2):hox011.
doi: 10.1093/hropen/hox011. eCollection 2017.

The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of art laboratory performance indicators

ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology; Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine
Comment

The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of art laboratory performance indicators

ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology et al. Hum Reprod Open. .

Abstract

Study question: What are appropriate performance indicators (PIs) for ART laboratories for use in monitoring 'fresh' IVF and ICSI cycles?

Summary answer: Minimum performance (competence) levels and aspirational (benchmark) values were recommended for a total of 19 indicators, including 12 key PIs (KPIs), five PIs and two reference indicators (RIs).

What is already known: PIs are necessary for systematic monitoring of the laboratory and an important element within the Quality Management System. However, there are no established PIs for ART laboratories and there is very little evidence on the topic.

Study design size duration: This is the report of a 2-day consensus meeting of expert professionals. As a starting point for the discussion, two surveys were organized to collect information on indicators used in IVF laboratories. During the meeting, the results of the surveys, scientific evidence (where available), and personal clinical experience where integrated into presentations by experts on specific topics. After presentation, each proposed indicator was discussed until consensus was reached within the panel.

Participants/materials setting methods: Expert professionals representing different countries and settings convened in the consensus meeting.

Main results and the role of chance: The paper is divided in two parts: the workshop report and the recommendations of the expert panel. The second part reflects the discussion on each of the indicators, with the agreed definition, competence level and benchmark value for each of the 19 indicators, including 12 KPIs, 5 PIs and 2 RIs.

Limitations reasons for caution: The KPIs are mainly based on expert opinion. Future research may warrant an update of the recommended KPIs, their definition and the competence level and benchmark values.

Wider implications of the findings: Based on the information presented, each ART laboratory should select its own set of KPIs founded on laboratory organization, and processes.

Study funding/competing interests: The consensus meeting and writing of the paper was supported by funds from ESHRE and Alpha. Alpha gratefully acknowledges the following organizations for their financial support, through the provision of unrestricted educational grants: Global Fertility Alliance, Merck, Origio and Vitrolife. There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Keywords: IVF; KPI; embryo; oocyte; performance indicator; sperm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment on

References

    1. Ahlstrom A, Westin C, Reismer E, Wikland M, Hardarson T. Trophectoderm morphology: an important parameter for predicting live birth after single blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod 2011;26:3289–3296. - PubMed
    1. Ahlstrom A, Westin C, Wikland M, Hardarson T. Prediction of live birth in frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles by pre-freeze and post-thaw morphology. Hum Reprod 2013;28:1199–1209. - PubMed
    1. Alpha Scientists In Reproductive Medicine The Alpha consensus meeting on cryopreservation key performance indicators and benchmarks: proceedings of an expert meeting. Reprod Biomed Online 2012;25:146–167. - PubMed
    1. Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine, ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1270–1283. and Reprod Biomed Online 2011;22:1632–46 (simultaneous publication).
    1. Arce JC, Andersen AN, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Visnova H, Bosch E, Garcia-Velasco JA, Barri P, de Sutter P, Klein BM, Fauser BC. Ovarian response to recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone: a randomized, antimullerian hormone-stratified, dose-response trial in women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 2014;102:1633–1640.e1635. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources